Re: letters of support Gregory K. Schmidt (17 Oct 2012 23:57 EST)
Re: letters of support Bonnie Kwit (18 Oct 2012 06:44 EST)
Re: letters of support Charles Hathaway (18 Oct 2012 08:03 EST)
Re: letters of support Deborah Hofer (18 Oct 2012 09:44 EST)
Re: letters of support Bonnie Kwit (18 Oct 2012 09:51 EST)
Re: letters of support Mike McCallister (18 Oct 2012 10:02 EST)
Re: letters of support Vincelli, Diana (18 Oct 2012 08:06 EST)
Re: letters of support Young, Katherine S (18 Oct 2012 09:04 EST)
Re: letters of support Bonnie Kwit (18 Oct 2012 09:13 EST)
Re: letters of support rdewey@mcdaniel.edu (18 Oct 2012 08:08 EST)

Re: letters of support Mike McCallister 18 Oct 2012 10:02 EST

Two points:

If someone mistrusts a process then they are too clueless to propose for funding. We don't feed paranoia and call it personalized customer service.

Second, and once again, agreement with what everyone has said doesn't merit posting.  We sound like Limbaugh fans and while some indication of consensus is useful, this is a time waster.

Spanky

On Oct 18, 2012, at 9:51 AM, Bonn Kwit<xxxxxx@OAKLAND.EDU> wrote:

> I agree with all of you.  Bad idea.  I guess we'll see how it plays out.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research Administration List
> [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Charles Hathaway
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 9:03 AM
> To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org
> Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] letters of support
>
> I would worry that lack of trust in eRA might mean lack of awareness of all
> the new rules and how reviewers may review differently.  More than that I
> think this PI needs to appreciate that things sent hard copy may never get
> to the reviewers!  The beauty of the new system is the single pdf
> "eApplication."  Is the SRO going to show them paper or somehow turn the
> paper into an extra pdf?  Do the reviewers want to be bothered by something
> outside the eApplication?  Are they required to even look at such things?
> Charlie
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Research Administration List [xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] on
> behalf of Bonnie Kwit [xxxxxx@OAKLAND.EDU]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 7:44 AM
> To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org
> Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] letters of support
>
> Why????  She doesn't trust the electronic submission process, I guess.
> Hasn't submitted since paper.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Research Administration List
> [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Gregory K. Schmidt
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 12:57 AM
> To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org
> Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] letters of support
>
> Well...why?  I guess to get University letterhead.  Anyway, it should be
> fine.  Make a PDF after.
>
> Bonnie Kwit <xxxxxx@OAKLAND.EDU> wrote:
>
>> Hello - Can PIs send letters of support written by their Dean to the
>> Program director via snail mail?  Our general practice is to upload the
>> letter of support in the g.g package, but this particular PI would like
>> the letter from her Dean to be sent via mail.  What do you think?
>>
>>
>>
>> Bonnie Kwit
>>
>> Grant and Contract Officer
>>
>> Oakland University
>>
>> Office of Research Administration
>>
>> 505 Wilson Hall
>>
>> (248) 370-4116
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
>> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
>> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)
>>
>> A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
>> ======================================================================
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available  via
> our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the  "LISTSERV" link
> in the upper right corner)
>
> A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
> ======================================================================
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available  via
> our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the  "LISTSERV" link
> in the upper right corner)
>
> A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
> ======================================================================
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available  via
> our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the  "LISTSERV" link
> in the upper right corner)
>
> A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
> ======================================================================
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)
>
> A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
> ======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
 "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner)

 A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help
======================================================================