Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Lawrence Waxler
(10 Aug 2012 10:13 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Athey, Rochelle R [VPRED]
(10 Aug 2012 11:37 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Wilhelm,Susan Marie
(10 Aug 2012 12:33 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Vogrig, Cheryl
(10 Aug 2012 13:13 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Sondra Redmont
(10 Aug 2012 13:31 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Farnsworth, Franci
(10 Aug 2012 15:18 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Rachelle Mainard
(10 Aug 2012 14:03 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Hajner, John E
(10 Aug 2012 12:48 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics Chris Thompson (10 Aug 2012 12:55 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Tracy Eisenhower
(10 Aug 2012 14:07 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Scott Niles
(10 Aug 2012 14:08 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Athey, Rochelle R [VPRED]
(13 Aug 2012 08:53 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Terri Maxwell
(10 Aug 2012 12:58 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics (UNCLASSIFIED)
Nguyen, Gauhar L CIV US USA MEDCOM TAMC
(10 Aug 2012 13:30 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Lawson, Alice
(13 Aug 2012 06:54 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Heidi Mina
(13 Aug 2012 07:02 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Kristi Stockdale
(13 Aug 2012 07:59 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Timothy Patrick Foley
(13 Aug 2012 09:02 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Michael Wetherholt
(13 Aug 2012 09:57 EST)
|
Re: Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics
Chris Thompson
(10 Aug 2012 12:45 EST)
|
That's a GREAT idea Rochelle! What kinds of factors are you thinking might go into it? I'd think number of documents, number of special reviews, size of the budget, number of sub recipients, reporting requirements (federal, state, etc.), number of personnel might be some good ones to start with. -Chris On 8/10/2012 12:37 PM, Athey, Rochelle R [VPRED] wrote: > We're trying to come up with a measure of complexity. I have a draft document that splits up our award types into complexity groups from 1 the least complex to 5 most complex. Let me know if you want a copy. I want to add the 1-5 complexity rating to our award database and run reports from time to time on complex awards. It's a very vague measure but it's better than what we have now (nothing). > > Rochelle R. Athey, CRA > Director > Office of Sponsored Programs Administration > Iowa State University > 1138 Pearson Hall > Ames Iowa 50011-2207 > Phone: 515-294-7723 > Fax: 515-294-8000 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Lawrence Waxler > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 10:13 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Sponsored Programs Performance Metrics > > Greetings > > Like all of you, our lives have become much more complex over the past few years, a trend that I do not see easing up. > > Looking back even five years, we didn’t have ARRA reporting, FFATA reporting, increased FCOI requirements, RCR was a smaller issue, and g.g was just cranking up, etc, etc., etc. > > I even remember when summer was catch-up time! > > However, when measuring what we do, we still rely heavily on how many proposals we process and how many awards we receive as the primary means of determining effectiveness and efficiency despite the fact that these measures do not capture life as we know it today. > > So…….does anyone out in grantland have any insight or perspective on how to convey that by way of performance metrics? > > Larry > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Larry Waxler, Director > Office of Sponsored Programs > University of Southern Maine > 15 Baxter Boulevard > P.O. Box 9300 > Portland, ME 04104-9300 > Telephone: 207-780-4413 > Telefax: 207-780-4927 > > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ======================================================================