NSF: Defining "year"
Michael Kusiak
(30 Jan 2018 13:16 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year" Donna Berger (30 Jan 2018 13:31 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Bonnie Kwit
(30 Jan 2018 16:24 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Robinson, Jacqueline
(30 Jan 2018 17:42 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Mary-Ellen Fortini
(31 Jan 2018 18:46 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Davis Hamilton, Zoya
(01 Feb 2018 10:13 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Sears, Heather
(01 Feb 2018 11:22 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Frederick, Jackie A.
(31 Jan 2018 11:38 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Adam Kuehn
(01 Feb 2018 13:08 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Michael Spires
(30 Jan 2018 13:33 EST)
|
Re: NSF: Defining "year"
Bonnie Kwit
(30 Jan 2018 13:44 EST)
|
Re: Defining "year"
Hampstead, Deborah A (Debbie)
(30 Jan 2018 14:14 EST)
|
Re: Defining "year"
Taylor, Jay (Jay Taylor)
(30 Jan 2018 14:40 EST)
|
We've always defined it in terms of the project year - no more than 2 months per project year. Donna Berger, Ph.D. Director, Academic Grants Marist College Phone: 845-575-3670 From: Michael Kusiak <xxxxxx@UCOP.EDU> To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org Date: 01/30/2018 01:18 PM Subject: [RESADM-L] NSF: Defining "year" Sent by: Research Administration List <xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org> I am looking for input how institutions have gone about defining “year” for the purposes of being compliant with the requirement in section in chapter II.C.2.g(i)(a)of the NSF PAPPG: “As a general policy, NSF limits the salary compensation requested in the proposal budget for senior personnel to no more than two months of their regular salary in any one year. It is the organization's responsibility to define and consistently apply the term "year", and to specify this definition in the budget justification. This limit includes salary compensation received from all NSF-funded grants.” Of the public descriptions I have seen of being compliant with this requirement, I have seen fiscal year being used as the definition of “year.” I could, however, see an argument to be made that you should maximize flexibility by simply defining “year” as the project periods defined in each award. I understand that the overall issue is about that two-month limitation on salary support from NSF. What’s the risk of defining a “year” as your institution’s fiscal year? Thank you for any feedback you may have. Mike Michael Joseph Kusiak Policy Resource Coordinator xxxxxx@ucop.edu 510-987-0659 Research Policy Analysis and Coordination University of California, Office of the President = = = = = = Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "RESADM-L" link under "Sponsored Programs"). A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help = = = = = = = = = = = = Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "RESADM-L" link under "Sponsored Programs"). A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help = = = = = =