|
Re: RESADM-L Digest - 8 Feb 2012 to 9 Feb 2012 (#2012-37)
Marina Aloyets
(10 Feb 2012 10:34 EST)
|
|
Re: RESADM-L Digest - 8 Feb 2012 to 9 Feb 2012 (#2012-37) Nichols, Nicole (10 Feb 2012 12:14 EST)
|
I love Adobe Acrobat X Pro b/c we can now actually edit headers and footers in the PDF's - we used to have to ask everyone for word docs so we could remove (and/or edit for paper) the headers and footers prior to submission, but with X Pro, we can take the PDF they give us and edit - we couldn't do that before :) -Nicole Nichols, MPA Certified Research Administrator xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Marina Aloyets Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 9:35 AM To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] RESADM-L Digest - 8 Feb 2012 to 9 Feb 2012 (#2012-37) Hi, we use Acrobat XPro and do not have any problems with submitting to grants.gov. We did remove all of the previous versions of Acrobat after installing XPro. Best, Marina On 2/10/2012 4:00 AM, RESADM-L automatic digest system wrote: > There are 37 messages totaling 9041 lines in this issue. > > Topics of the day: > > 1. Question on applying Salary limitations (NIH) > 2. Adobe XPro (6) > 3. Survey Tools Researchers use (3) > 4. Open Position: Director, OSRP > 5. Disposition of Equipment Purchased with Federal Funds > 6. Question on Other Support (12) > 7. FW: SF424 Other Support Guidelines > 8. Grants.gov errors--unintelligible (6) > 9. Grants.gov errors--unintelligible (UNCLASSIFIED) (2) > 10. Note about list spam... > 11. Kent State and NEH Workshop 2/27/12 > 12. USA-Canada collaborative funding opportunities for biomedical researchers? > 13. NIH abstracts > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:10:51 -0600 > From: "Cotten,Melinda T"<xxxxxx@MDANDERSON.ORG> > Subject: Re: Question on applying Salary limitations (NIH) > > My interpretation is that the initial issue date is the date at the very top of page one for each budget period, regardless of type (type 1, 2, 5) or year. If you have a revised NGA issued after 12/23/11 for a previously awarded budget period, then the new (reduced) cap will not apply until the next budget period. > > > Sincerely, > Melinda Cotten > Executive Director > Office of Sponsored Programs > M. D. Anderson Cancer Center > > View Our Website<http://www.mdanderson.org/education-and-research/departments-programs-and-labs/departments-and-divisions/office-of-sponsored-programs/index.html> > > This email is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this email message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and destroy/delete all copies of the transmittal. Thank you. > > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Key, Diana > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 3:53 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on applying Salary limitations (NIH) > > I would also like to know how you (list members) will handle determination of "initial issue date" for NIH subawards (new and amended) coming into your institution. > > Diana > > Diana L. Key > Associate Director > Sponsored Research Services<http://www.research.fsu.edu/contractsgrants/index.html> > Florida State University > 874 Traditions Way > Tallahassee, FL 32306-4166 > P: 850-644-8648 F: 850-644-1464 > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Richard Brandt > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2012 1:49 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Question on applying Salary limitations (NIH) > > Good morning, > > I'm hoping that some of our friends at the NIH are listening this morning. > > http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-12-035.html > > May we have a stated definition for "Initial Issue Date" for NIH awards. > > If we are looking at a new award i.e. 1 R01 AA0000001 -01 initial issue date is easy. > > If we are looking at a non-competing year 2 i.e. 5 R01 AA0000001-02. Which is the initial issue date, the issue date of the first or competing year or do the second (or third or fourth) years acquire an independent initial issue date? > > What would be the initial issue date for a transfer award, does the Initial Issue date reset when the award moves to the new institution? > > I'm reading the NOT above and there is language that could be argued either way on a non-competing award. And we all know professors that will argue whatever is in their favor that day. > > I'm at a small firm that has limited general funds, this reduction will mean a $20K pay cut to two professors when it becomes effective for them. > > I need my ducks in a row to cut the boss' pay by 20K. > > Thank you for all you do! > > Richard > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Richard E. Brandt C.R.A. > Chief Administrative Officer > Vaccine Research Institute of San Diego > 3030 Bunker Hill Street, Ste 203 > San Diego, CA 92109 > 858-581-3960 > xxxxxx@vrisd.org<mailto:xxxxxx@vrisd.org> > > > > > > > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:14:15 -0700 > From: "Haverstock, Cindy A"<xxxxxx@BANNERHEALTH.COM> > Subject: Adobe XPro > > Does anyone on the list use Adobe XPro vs. 9 Pro and, if so, no problems with grants.gov submissions? > > Thanks, Cindy > > Cindy Haverstock > Grants Manager > Grants Strategy Development and Administration > Banner Health > 1441 North 12th Street > Phoenix, AZ 85006-2837 > Phone: 602-747-8136 > Fax: 602-747-4185 > > Our Mission: "We exist to make a difference in people's lives through excellent patient care." > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:15:11 +0000 > From: Terrence Hibbert<xxxxxx@UMC.EDU> > Subject: Survey Tools Researchers use > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I'm new to this listserv so if this question has been asked before, please forgive me (couldn't find anything in the archives). Does anyone know what tools their researchers use to conduct sophisticated surveys in the community? > > > > Our researchers have used many different tools from simple ones like surveymonkey to customizable ones like redcap. We have started talking about getting the organization to support one major survey tool and i'd love to get suggestions from this group. Some surveys have pretty significant requirements for respondent anonymity and user interfaces (like a calendar that can show a respondent the days surveys were completed and how it corresponds to major events). So far I've had suggestions like qualtrics and snapsurveys. > > > > Thanks in advance for your help! > > > > Terrence Hibbert > UMMC Solutions Consulting Team > 954.740.3433 > > > Individuals who have received this information in error or are not authorized to receive it must promptly return or dispose of the information and notify the sender. Those individuals are hereby notified that they are strictly prohibited from reviewing, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing or using this information in any way. > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:36:05 +0000 > From: Corey Burger<xxxxxx@USU.EDU> > Subject: Re: Adobe XPro > > X Pro works fine for us. > > S. Corey Burger > Contract Administrator, Sponsored Programs > Office of Research and Graduate Studies > Utah State University > > (435) 797-1661 - xxxxxx@usu.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@usu.edu> > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Haverstock, Cindy A > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:14 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Adobe XPro > > Does anyone on the list use Adobe XPro vs. 9 Pro and, if so, no problems with grants.gov submissions? > > Thanks, Cindy > > Cindy Haverstock > Grants Manager > Grants Strategy Development and Administration > Banner Health > 1441 North 12th Street > Phoenix, AZ 85006-2837 > Phone: 602-747-8136 > Fax: 602-747-4185 > > Our Mission: "We exist to make a difference in people's lives through excellent patient care." > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:40:29 +0000 > From: "Vogrig, Cheryl"<xxxxxx@CALU.EDU> > Subject: Re: Adobe XPro > > I have not experienced any issues with it. > > Thanks, > > Cheryl > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Haverstock, Cindy A > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:14 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Adobe XPro > > Does anyone on the list use Adobe XPro vs. 9 Pro and, if so, no problems with grants.gov submissions? > > Thanks, Cindy > > Cindy Haverstock > Grants Manager > Grants Strategy Development and Administration > Banner Health > 1441 North 12th Street > Phoenix, AZ 85006-2837 > Phone: 602-747-8136 > Fax: 602-747-4185 > > Our Mission: "We exist to make a difference in people's lives through excellent patient care." > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 07:40:52 -0800 > From: Deborah Hofer<xxxxxx@SOU.EDU> > Subject: Re: Survey Tools Researchers use > > Good morning. Our faculty primarily use SurveyMonkey. > > What do you mean by 'sophisticated'? Our surveys run the gamut from > community attitudes on of quality of life and parental views on childrens' > video gaming to public opinion about the local police department. > > As both the Research and IRB administrator, I look at survey tools to > ensure confidentiality of information, ability of participants to skip > questions and/or stop participation without consequence, and ability to > read and acknowledge informed consent. > > Would be interested in responses you receive. > * > * > *Deborah d'Este Hofer MM* > **** > > > Southern Oregon University > > Grants& Sponsored Programs > > Institutional Review Board > > 1250 Siskiyou Blvd > > Ashland, OR 97520 > > Computing Services West 210 > 541.552.8662 > > xxxxxx@sou.edu > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Terrence Hibbert<xxxxxx@umc.edu> wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> >> >> I'm new to this listserv so if this question has been asked before, please >> forgive me (couldn't find anything in the archives). Does anyone know what >> tools their researchers use to conduct sophisticated surveys in the >> community? >> >> >> >> Our researchers have used many different tools from simple ones like >> surveymonkey to customizable ones like redcap. We have started talking >> about getting the organization to support one major survey tool and i'd >> love to get suggestions from this group. Some surveys have pretty >> significant requirements for respondent anonymity and user interfaces (like >> a calendar that can show a respondent the days surveys were completed and >> how it corresponds to major events). So far I've had suggestions like >> qualtrics and snapsurveys. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance for your help! >> >> >> Terrence Hibbert >> UMMC Solutions Consulting Team >> 954.740.3433 >> >> Individuals who have received this information in error or are not >> authorized to receive it must promptly return or dispose of the information >> and notify the sender. Those individuals are hereby notified that they are >> strictly prohibited from reviewing, forwarding, printing, copying, >> distributing or using this information in any way. >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via >> our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" >> link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help====================================================================== >> > > > - > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:47:28 +0000 > From: Myra Keeble<xxxxxx@KLEINBUENDEL.COM> > Subject: Re: Adobe XPro > > We have it - No problems with submissions; however, once the grant has been concatenated the printed version has some very strange font bugs embedded in it (we've tested version 9 vs. version X and it's definitely in the new version only). In order to print, we create a "rasterized" version first. It looks fine on-screen, however. > > Myra A. Keeble, M.A. > Business Development Director > Klein Buendel, Inc., 1667 Cole Blvd., Ste. 225, Golden, CO 80401 > xxxxxx@kleinbuendel.com<mailto:xxxxxx@kleinbuendel.com>; www.kleinbuendel.com<http://www.kleinbuendel.com> > (303) 565-4333 (Office); (303) 565-4320 Fax > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Haverstock, Cindy A > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:14 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Adobe XPro > > Does anyone on the list use Adobe XPro vs. 9 Pro and, if so, no problems with grants.gov submissions? > > Thanks, Cindy > > Cindy Haverstock > Grants Manager > Grants Strategy Development and Administration > Banner Health > 1441 North 12th Street > Phoenix, AZ 85006-2837 > Phone: 602-747-8136 > Fax: 602-747-4185 > > Our Mission: "We exist to make a difference in people's lives through excellent patient care." > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:42:46 +0000 > From: "Lisa L. Thompson"<xxxxxx@DARTMOUTH.EDU> > Subject: Re: Adobe XPro > > It has been working fine for me as well. > > Happy Trails, > > Lisa > --------------- > Lisa L. Thompson, CRA > Grants Officer > Office of Sponsored Projects > Dartmouth College > > Phone: (603) 646-3682 > Fax: (603) 646-3670 > Main Office: (603) 646-3007 > xxxxxx@dartmouth.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@dartmouth.edu> > > Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them humanity cannot survive. > My religion is very simple. My religion is kindness. Dalai Lama<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/d/dalailama108820.html> > > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Corey Burger > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:36 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Adobe XPro > > X Pro works fine for us. > > S. Corey Burger > Contract Administrator, Sponsored Programs > Office of Research and Graduate Studies > Utah State University > > (435) 797-1661 - xxxxxx@usu.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@usu.edu> > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org]<mailto:[mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org]> On Behalf Of Haverstock, Cindy A > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 8:14 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org<mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org> > Subject: [RESADM-L] Adobe XPro > > Does anyone on the list use Adobe XPro vs. 9 Pro and, if so, no problems with grants.gov submissions? > > Thanks, Cindy > > Cindy Haverstock > Grants Manager > Grants Strategy Development and Administration > Banner Health > 1441 North 12th Street > Phoenix, AZ 85006-2837 > Phone: 602-747-8136 > Fax: 602-747-4185 > > Our Mission: "We exist to make a difference in people's lives through excellent patient care." > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:46:51 -0500 > From: Linda Downs-Bembury<xxxxxx@SCHOOLPH.UMASS.EDU> > Subject: Re: Adobe XPro > > I use Xpro and my Grants Office uses 9 and we have had issues primarily with the cover letters that I scan in. I am now scanning them and then writing them to a pdf file. > > Linda > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Haverstock, Cindy A > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:14 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Adobe XPro > > Does anyone on the list use Adobe XPro vs. 9 Pro and, if so, no problems with grants.gov submissions? > > Thanks, Cindy > > Cindy Haverstock > Grants Manager > Grants Strategy Development and Administration > Banner Health > 1441 North 12th Street > Phoenix, AZ 85006-2837 > Phone: 602-747-8136 > Fax: 602-747-4185 > > Our Mission: "We exist to make a difference in people's lives through excellent patient care." > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 09:57:08 -0600 > From: Patience Graybill<xxxxxx@SIUE.EDU> > Subject: Re: Survey Tools Researchers use > > Qualtrics is a fantastic survey software that allows its users to protect > participant identity while also tracking them in panels, to create an array > of question types, and to produce multiple report types and in different > formats, including SPSS. It's a very flexible tool. Our faculty raves about > it. > > Our institution has a license, but one can get a free trial. > > Customer support and online Help are also really great. > > We actually use it in our office for internal grant review panels as well. > > > > Patience Graybill Condellone > > Research Administrator > > Office of Research and Projects > > Southern Illinois University Edwardsville > > ph: 618.650.5618 > > fax: 618.650.3523 > > > > > > > > From: Research Administration List > [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Deborah Hofer > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 9:41 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Survey Tools Researchers use > > > > Good morning. Our faculty primarily use SurveyMonkey. > > > > What do you mean by 'sophisticated'? Our surveys run the gamut from > community attitudes on of quality of life and parental views on childrens' > video gaming to public opinion about the local police department. > > > > As both the Research and IRB administrator, I look at survey tools to ensure > confidentiality of information, ability of participants to skip questions > and/or stop participation without consequence, and ability to read and > acknowledge informed consent. > > > > Would be interested in responses you receive. > > > > Deborah d'Este Hofer MM > > > > <http://www.sou.edu/it/images/email_signature.bmp> > > Southern Oregon University > > Grants& Sponsored Programs > > Institutional Review Board > > 1250 Siskiyou Blvd > > Ashland, OR 97520 > > Computing Services West 210 > 541.552.8662 > > xxxxxx@sou.edu > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Terrence Hibbert<xxxxxx@umc.edu> wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I'm new to this listserv so if this question has been asked before, please > forgive me (couldn't find anything in the archives). Does anyone know what > tools their researchers use to conduct sophisticated surveys in the > community? > > > > Our researchers have used many different tools from simple ones like > surveymonkey to customizable ones like redcap. We have started talking about > getting the organization to support one major survey tool and i'd love to > get suggestions from this group. Some surveys have pretty significant > requirements for respondent anonymity and user interfaces (like a calendar > that can show a respondent the days surveys were completed and how it > corresponds to major events). So far I've had suggestions like qualtrics and > snapsurveys. > > > > Thanks in advance for your help! > > > > Terrence Hibbert > > UMMC Solutions Consulting Team > > 954.740.3433 > > > Individuals who have received this information in error or are not > authorized to receive it must promptly return or dispose of the information > and notify the sender. Those individuals are hereby notified that they are > strictly prohibited from reviewing, forwarding, printing, copying, > distributing or using this information in any way. > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription > information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at > http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper > right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > > > > > > - > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription > information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at > http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper > right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:50:29 -0500 > From: "Ohlandt, Julie Anne"<xxxxxx@COFC.EDU> > Subject: Open Position: Director, OSRP > > Please see the attached ad for an exciting opportunity at my alma mater. > The Queens family offers a wonderful community, and campus is located in > a great part of Charlotte, NC. > > > > Julie Ohlandt, MPA > > Grants Administrator > > Office of Research& Grants Administration > > College of Charleston > > 66 George St > > Charleston, SC 29424 > > Phone 843-953-5673 > > http://orga.cofc.edu<http://orga.cofc.edu/> > > xxxxxx@cofc.edu > > xxxxxx@cofc.edu > > > > xxxxxx@cofc.edu > > > > Let us remember that, as much has been given us, much will be expected > from us, and that true homage comes from the heart as well as from the > lips, and shows itself in deeds. - Theodore Roosevelt > > > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:15:26 -0600 > From: Jennifer Rutt<xxxxxx@UNLNOTES.UNL.EDU> > Subject: Disposition of Equipment Purchased with Federal Funds > > We are having some good discussions on disposition of equipment purchased > with federal funds. A-110 says: > > 34(g) When the recipient no longer needs the equipment, the equipment may > be used for other activities in accordance with the following standards. > For equipment with a current per unit fair market value of $5000 or more, > the recipient may retain the equipment for other uses provided that > compensation is made to the original Federal awarding agency or its > successor. The amount of compensation shall be computed by applying the > percentage of Federal participation in the cost of the original project or > program to the current fair market value of the equipment. If the > recipient has no need for the equipment, the recipient shall request > disposition instructions from the Federal awarding agency. The Federal > awarding agency shall determine whether the equipment can be used to meet > the agency's requirements. If no requirement exists within that agency, > the availability of the equipment shall be reported to the General > Services Administration by the Federal awarding agency to determine > whether a requirement for the equipment exists in other Federal agencies. > The Federal awarding agency shall issue instructions to the recipient no > later than 120 calendar days after the recipient's request and the > following procedures shall govern. > > (1) If so instructed or if disposition instructions are not issued > within 120 calendar days after the recipient's request, the recipient > shall sell the equipment and reimburse the Federal awarding agency an > amount computed by applying to the sales proceeds the percentage of > Federal participation in the cost of the original project or program. > However, the recipient shall be permitted to deduct and retain from the > Federal share $500 or ten percent of the proceeds, whichever is less, for > the recipient's selling and handling expenses. > > The question is, does the $5000 per unit fair market value apply to (1)? > If not, then whenever we sell a piece of equipment, regardless of the fair > market value, we are going to have send payment into the government. Your > thoughts are appreciated! > > Jeanne > > Jeanne Wicks > UNL OSP Director > Alex West, 312 N 14th Street > Lincoln, NE 68588-0430 > Email: xxxxxx@unl.edu > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:32:30 -0600 > From: "Nichols, Nicole"<xxxxxx@DOM.WUSTL.EDU> > Subject: Question on Other Support > > Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked around my institution -- some departments remove the current submission from the pending section when submitting other support for a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. > > Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! > > -Nicole Nichols, MPA > Certified Research Administrator > xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:53:47 -0600 > From: "Nichols, Nicole"<xxxxxx@DOM.WUSTL.EDU> > Subject: FW: SF424 Other Support Guidelines > > Someone in my grants office just sent me this info - so, looks like OS for the submission should NOT be included. > > Thanks! > > -Nicole Nichols, MPA > Certified Research Administrator > xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu > > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:47 AM > To: Nichols, Nicole > Subject: SF424 Other Support Guidelines > > SF424 guidelines: > > Other Support Information > Information on Other Support should be submitted ONLY when requested by the NIH Institute/Center (IC). > > There is no form page for Other Support. Follow the sample format provided below. The sample is intended to provide guidance regarding the type and extent of information requested. > The following instructions should be followed in completing the information: > > * Information on active and pending Other Support is required for senior/key personnel, excluding consultants. For individuals with no active or pending support, indicate "None." Neither the application under consideration nor the current PHS award for this project should be listed as Other Support. Do not include Other Support for individuals listed as "Other Significant Contributors" unless their involvement has changed so that they now meet the definition of "senior/key personnel." > > * If the support is provided under a consortium/contractual arrangement or is part of a multiproject award, indicate the project number, PD/PI, and source for the overall project, and provide all other information for the subproject only. > > > Here you go - thanks! I just learned something new! :) > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:14:22 +0000 > From: "Nadler, Elsa"<xxxxxx@UTOLEDO.EDU> > Subject: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > Elsa G. Nadler > Director of Grants Development > 3000 Arlington Avenue > Mail Stop 1020 > Toledo, OH 43614 > Ph: 419.383.5302 > Fax: 419.383.4262 > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:37:20 -0800 > From: "Donahue, Sherie (LLU)"<xxxxxx@LLU.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > I read somewhere in the NIH documentation a couple of years ago that you > were NOT to include the current pending project in the other support > list for a JIT. I believe you should be able to find the documentation > in the SF424 guide under the JIT section. > > > > Sherie Donahue, MS, CRA - Electronic Research Specialist > LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY | Office of the Vice President for Research > Affairs > Loma Linda, CA 92350 > (909) 651-5098 or (909) 558-1000, x83911* (909) 558-0244 (fax) * > xxxxxx@llu.edu > > The difficult we do immediately. The impossible takes a little longer. - > motto of the US Army Corps of Engineers during WWII > Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - > Albert Einstein > > > > From: Research Administration List > [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nichols, Nicole > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 9:33 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > > > Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on whether > to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I have a JIT > request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- some have this > submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked around my > institution -- some departments remove the current submission from the > pending section when submitting other support for a JIT for that > particular submission (considering other support to be "other" than te > application in question -- others leave it on. > > > > Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! > > > > -Nicole Nichols, MPA > > Certified Research Administrator > > xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via > our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" > link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:43:23 -0800 > From: "Donahue, Sherie (LLU)"<xxxxxx@LLU.EDU> > Subject: Re: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > I am guessing there is something in the budget too. The only thing that > makes a little sense to me is 'CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid; I > believe that stands for cumulative number of trainees. Perhaps if that > is fixed it might fix some of the other errors. If not, call the > grants.gov helpdesk and they should be able to point you in the right > direction. > > Remember, so errors are caused by the lack of (or incorrect) data in a > field, others can be caused by entering data into a field that should be > blank. > > > > Hope that helps! > > > > Sherie > > > > > > Sherie Donahue, MS, CRA - Electronic Research Specialist > LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY | Office of the Vice President for Research > Affairs > Loma Linda, CA 92350 > (909) 651-5098 or (909) 558-1000, x83911* (909) 558-0244 (fax) * > xxxxxx@llu.edu > > The difficult we do immediately. The impossible takes a little longer. - > motto of the US Army Corps of Engineers during WWII > Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - > Albert Einstein > > > > From: Research Administration List > [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nadler, Elsa > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:14 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to > have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is > not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of > element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with > length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type > 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element > 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with > length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type > 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element > 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > > > > Elsa G. Nadler > > Director of Grants Development > > 3000 Arlington Avenue > > Mail Stop 1020 > > Toledo, OH 43614 > > Ph: 419.383.5302 > > Fax: 419.383.4262 > > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via > our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" > link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:49:49 +0000 > From: "Throp, Jay"<xxxxxx@TUFTS.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > HI Nicole: > > Usually the best move to make is to have them list it in Pending, particularly where it is being asked for as JIT. Would also include a statement there also, something to the effect: > > "Should this application receive funding, appropriate adjustments, if needed, will be made in funding and program in consultation with Grants Management and the Program Official (s)." > > Its generic, however, it leaves the door open for you P I (yow 40) to negotiate the best outcome AFTER the agency informs you of the funding level. > > Hope this helps. > > > Jay H. Throp, > Consultant, Research Administration > Office of the Vice Provost > Tufts University > 75 Kneeland Street - Suite 950 > Boston, Massachusetts 02111 > T: (617)636-6550 F: (617)627-3673 > xxxxxx@tufts.edu > > > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nichols, Nicole > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:33 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked around my institution -- some departments remove the current submission from the pending section when submitting other support for a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. > > Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! > > -Nicole Nichols, MPA > Certified Research Administrator > xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:49:00 -0800 > From: "Olin, Lynda - (lolin)"<xxxxxx@EMAIL.ARIZONA.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > Nicole: > > > From the Part III of the PHS SF24 (R&R) Adobe Forms Version B Application Guide - Other Support Information (page III-8 in the March 25, 2011 version) > > > > The following instructions should be followed in completing the information: > > • Information on active and pending Other Support is required for Senior/Key Personnel, excluding consultants. For individuals with no active or pending support, indicate "None." Neither the application under consideration nor the current PHS award for this project should be listed as Other Support. Do not include Other Support for individuals listed as "Other Significant Contributors" unless their involvement has changed so that they now meet the definition of "Senior/Key Personnel." > > > Best Regards, > > Lynda > > Lynda Olin, MA, MS, CRA > Research Special Projects Coordinator > University of Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Research Administration List [xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nichols, Nicole [xxxxxx@DOM.WUSTL.EDU] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 10:32 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > Other Support question – is there a specific policy/practice on whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel– some have this submission on their pending and some don’t. I’ve asked around my institution -- some departments remove the current submission from the pending section when submitting other support for a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be “other” than te application in question -- others leave it on. > > Just wondering if there is a “best practice” – thanks! > > -Nicole Nichols, MPA > Certified Research Administrator > xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:02:00 -0500 > From: "McGlade, Jane F CTR US USA MEDCOM WRAIR"<xxxxxx@US.ARMY.MIL> > Subject: Re: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > It has been my experience that unintelligible or machine language errors require you to consult the grants.gov help desk. On a recent submission we had two similarly strange errors and it turned out one number we entered on the R&R budget form was too large. I actually tried to look up the error from a list of common errors and was misled to think we had to redo the entire proposal; but the help desk's guidance was to reduce the number on our budget and list the true number in our budget justification. Hope that helps and hope you get the typically great help from the help desk. (too much help? No such thing!) > > Jane F. McGlade, Manager > Sponsored Research > Walter Reed Army Inst of Research > BLDG 503 Room 2W125 > PH: 301-319-2049 > Fax: 301-319-9810 > Cell: 240-494-6378 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nadler, Elsa > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:14 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > > > > Elsa G. Nadler > > Director of Grants Development > > 3000 Arlington Avenue > > Mail Stop 1020 > > Toledo, OH 43614 > > Ph: 419.383.5302 > > Fax: 419.383.4262 > > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu > > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org<blockedhttp://www.healthresearch.org> (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help<blockedhttp://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help> ====================================================================== > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:19:31 -0600 > From: "Schreiber, Hollie"<xxxxxx@OKSTATE.EDU> > Subject: Re: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Elsa, > > We have seen #1 and #2 in particular. The trainee field on the cumulative will only allow 3 digits. So if you have>999 participants, it will give you an error. For ours, we reduced our stated number on the budget pages to 999, and then included the true number in our justification. > > Some of the others (#4 and 6) are generally familiar in language and tone and we found that we had issues with the length of our attachment file names. It seems like #3 and #5 may be that there are blanks in fields that need zeroes or vice versa. > > This is educated hypotheses on our part ... hope it's helpful > > Hollie (and Jana West) > Hollie Schreiber, MBA, CRA > Manager, Sponsored Programs Administration > Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources > 256A Agricultural Hall > Stillwater, OK 74078 > (405) 744-7196; (405) 744-8863 fax > [cid:image001.gif@01CCE72D.754C9700] > > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nadler, Elsa > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 12:14 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > Elsa G. Nadler > Director of Grants Development > 3000 Arlington Avenue > Mail Stop 1020 > Toledo, OH 43614 > Ph: 419.383.5302 > Fax: 419.383.4262 > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:26:47 -0500 > From: Mike Imbalzano<xxxxxx@GMAIL.COM> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > I always list the current grant under pending. On occasion, I have > been asked by the GMS to list it as current and to resubmit. I > wouldn't leave it off. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nichols, Nicole<xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> wrote: >> Other Support question – is there a specific policy/practice on whether to >> include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I have a JIT >> request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel– some have this >> submission on their pending and some don’t. I’ve asked around my >> institution -- some departments remove the current submission from the >> pending section when submitting other support for a JIT for that particular >> submission (considering other support to be “other” than te application in >> question -- others leave it on. >> >> >> >> Just wondering if there is a “best practice” – thanks! >> >> >> >> -Nicole Nichols, MPA >> >> Certified Research Administrator >> >> xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu >> >> >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription >> information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at >> http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper >> right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >> ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:38:09 -0600 > From: Heidi Davis<xxxxxx@LOYNO.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > It seems redundant to include the current application as pending, but like Mike, I've also been asked by NIH to add it. > > Heidi Davis, Ph.D. > Director, Grants and Sponsored Programs > Mercy Hall, Rm 106 > Loyola University New Orleans > 6363 St. Charles Avenue > New Orleans, LA 70118 > (504) 864-7244 > (504) 864-7255 (direct) > xxxxxx@loyno.edu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Mike Imbalzano > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:27 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > I always list the current grant under pending. On occasion, I have been asked by the GMS to list it as current and to resubmit. I wouldn't leave it off. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nichols, Nicole<xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> wrote: >> Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on >> whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I >> have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- >> some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked >> around my institution -- some departments remove the current >> submission from the pending section when submitting other support for >> a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be >> "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. >> >> >> >> Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! >> >> >> >> -Nicole Nichols, MPA >> >> Certified Research Administrator >> >> xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu >> >> >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >> ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 19:41:14 +0000 > From: Daniel S Rademacher<xxxxxx@NORTHWESTERN.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > From PHS 398: > > The following instructions should be followed in completing the information: > . Information on active and pending Other Support is required for Senior/key Personnel, excluding consultants. For individuals with no active or pending support, indicate "None." Neither the application under consideration nor the current PHS award for this project should be listed as Other Support. Do not include Other Support for individuals listed as "Other Significant Contributors" unless their involvement has changed so that they now meet the definition of "Senior/key Personnel." > > I hope this helps. > > D > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Mike Imbalzano > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:27 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > I always list the current grant under pending. On occasion, I have been asked by the GMS to list it as current and to resubmit. I wouldn't leave it off. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nichols, Nicole<xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> wrote: >> Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on >> whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I >> have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- >> some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked >> around my institution -- some departments remove the current >> submission from the pending section when submitting other support for >> a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be >> "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. >> >> >> >> Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! >> >> >> >> -Nicole Nichols, MPA >> >> Certified Research Administrator >> >> xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu >> >> >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >> ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:44:17 -0800 > From: "Donahue, Sherie (LLU)"<xxxxxx@LLU.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > We had been told in the past by GMS to leave it off, so it may vary depending on the person. However, if you list the current grant on the Other Support, wouldn't you also have to say that the scientific overlap is 100%? :) > > Sherie Donahue, MS, CRA - Electronic Research Specialist > LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY | Office of the Vice President for Research Affairs > Loma Linda, CA 92350 > (909) 651-5098 or (909) 558-1000, x83911· (909) 558-0244 (fax) · xxxxxx@llu.edu > The difficult we do immediately. The impossible takes a little longer. - motto of the US Army Corps of Engineers during WWII > Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Mike Imbalzano > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:27 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > I always list the current grant under pending. On occasion, I have been asked by the GMS to list it as current and to resubmit. I wouldn't leave it off. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nichols, Nicole<xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> wrote: >> Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on >> whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I >> have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- >> some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked >> around my institution -- some departments remove the current >> submission from the pending section when submitting other support for >> a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be >> "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. >> >> >> >> Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! >> >> >> >> -Nicole Nichols, MPA >> >> Certified Research Administrator >> >> xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu >> >> >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >> ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:51:35 -0500 > From: "Mike L. Varney"<xxxxxx@HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> > Subject: Note about list spam... > > > I see that a few days ago a couple pieces of SPAM got through to the list. > > The ListServ does have a virus scanner, however this type of SPAM is > difficult to filter as it came from a registered member and contained only > a URL and a text file. > > Unfortunately, these messages get through from time to time. If you saw > how many messages get sent and are properly filtered by the software, you'd > be amazed that only those 2 got through in recent history! > > -- M > > > Mike Varney > Assistant Director, Information Systems > Health Research Incorporated > 150 Broadway, Suite 560 > Menands, NY 12204-2719 > Phone: 518-431-1200 Fax: 518-431-1234 > Email: xxxxxx@healthresearch.org Website: www.healthresearch.org > > > > > > > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:04:21 +0000 > From: "xxxxxx@mcdaniel.edu"<xxxxxx@MCDANIEL.EDU> > Subject: Re: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Best I can decipher it is saying: > 1: you have a value of 1100 in a field that only allows for a maximum of 999 > 2: a value of 1100 for your cumulative number of trainees > 3: a blank in a field that needs to have a value of at least 1 > 4: a blank in a field that needs some sort of description > 5: a blank in a field that needs to have a value of at least 1 > 6: a blank in a field that needs some sort of description > > I would guess some numbers went wonky somewhere, or you have a corrupt application file. > > Helpful at all? > > Robin > > From: "Nadler, Elsa"<xxxxxx@UTOLEDO.EDU<mailto:xxxxxx@UTOLEDO.EDU>> > Reply-To: Research Administration List<xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org<mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org>> > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 18:14:22 +0000 > To: Research Administration List<xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org<mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org>> > Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > Elsa G. Nadler > Director of Grants Development > 3000 Arlington Avenue > Mail Stop 1020 > Toledo, OH 43614 > Ph: 419.383.5302 > Fax: 419.383.4262 > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@utoledo.edu> > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:28:47 -0500 > From: Jim Ayres<xxxxxx@RESEARCH.UMASS.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > [Message contains invalid MIME fields or encoding and could not be processed] > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:07:42 -0500 > From: "MILLER, LAURA"<xxxxxx@KENT.EDU> > Subject: Kent State and NEH Workshop 2/27/12 > > The National Endowment for the Humanities& Kent State University's Office of Sponsored Programs are hosting a one day regional workshop on Monday, February 27, 2012 in KSU Student Center, Room 310 A . > > Senior Program Officer, Dr. John Cox, will provide an overview of the NEH mission, programs and special initiatives. This workshop is free and open to all faculty, staff, students and the public but registration is required. You are welcome to come and go between sessions, and refreshments will be provided. Parking is available at Kent State Student Center visitor's lot. $6 max per day. > > 8:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Registration > > 9:00 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Welcome > > 9:15 a.m. - 10:30 a.m. Endowment programs and special initiatives > > 10:30 a.m. - 10:45 a.m. Question and comment period > > 11:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Panel Session/strategies for application-writing > > 12:30 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Q& A and Closing remarks > > > > Please register is required for the workshop as space is limited. > > For registration: http://reg.abcsignup.com/reg/event_page.aspx?ek=0055-0003-A5E2347457F748F9997DB26EFD1426ED > > Campus map: http://www.kent.edu/campuses/maps/map.cfm > > > Please see the attached flyer for the agenda! > > > Laura J. Miller| Sponsored Programs Administrator| Research& Sponsored Programs|134 Cartwright Hall | Kent State University|44242-0001| 330-672-0703 ( p ) | 330.672.7991 ( f ) | xxxxxx@kent.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@kent.edu> > > [cid:image001.png@01CCE73C.91984030] > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:36:48 -0500 > From: "Sisco, Stephanie L."<xxxxxx@BSU.EDU> > Subject: Re: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Hi Elsa, > > Had you started to complete the R&R form but then ended up needing the modular? I received similar types of errors recently, and once I completely deleted all of my entries on the R&R and pulled it back oner (and then completed the modular), the submission went through fine. > > Good luck! > Stephanie > ________________________________________ > From: Research Administration List [xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nadler, Elsa [xxxxxx@UTOLEDO.EDU] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:14 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > Elsa G. Nadler > Director of Grants Development > 3000 Arlington Avenue > Mail Stop 1020 > Toledo, OH 43614 > Ph: 419.383.5302 > Fax: 419.383.4262 > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:40:06 +0000 > From: Susan E Morris<xxxxxx@NORTHWESTERN.EDU> > Subject: USA-Canada collaborative funding opportunities for biomedical researchers? > > Hi all, > > I have a faculty member who is looking for a funding program specifically designed for USA-Canada collaborations -- one that would fund biomedical research. Our "Plan A" is to apply for NIH R21 or R01 funding with our Canadian collaborator as a foreign subawardee, which I've done in the past, but this PI is asking if there are more tailored opportunities out there. > > Thanks to the internet, I can see that NIH and CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research) have released a few joint solicitations in the past, but nothing current. Is anyone out there familiar with an active program or sponsor that would be a good fit? > > Many thanks, > Susan > > ________________________________ > Susan E. Morris > Research Administrator, Biomedical Engineering > 2145 Sheridan Rd, Tech M328 > 847/491.7341 ~ xxxxxx@northwestern.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@northwestern.edu> > http://ra.mccormick.northwestern.edu<http://ra.mccormick.northwestern.edu/> > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:51:37 +0000 > From: Liana Setti<xxxxxx@UTPA.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > More and more I've seen NSF require that you include the new proposal being submitted as pending; at least then everyone on the project has at least one current/pending project to list. Not sure about JITs for NIH; we don't do those as much. > > Liana Setti Ryan, CRA > Grants& Contracts Specialist II > Office of Research& Sponsored Projects > The University of Texas-Pan American > 1201 W. University Drive > Edinburg, TX 78539-2999 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Donahue, Sherie (LLU) > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:44 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > We had been told in the past by GMS to leave it off, so it may vary depending on the person. However, if you list the current grant on the Other Support, wouldn't you also have to say that the scientific overlap is 100%? :) > > Sherie Donahue, MS, CRA - Electronic Research Specialist > LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY | Office of the Vice President for Research Affairs > Loma Linda, CA 92350 > (909) 651-5098 or (909) 558-1000, x83911· (909) 558-0244 (fax) · xxxxxx@llu.edu > The difficult we do immediately. The impossible takes a little longer. - motto of the US Army Corps of Engineers during WWII > Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Mike Imbalzano > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:27 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > I always list the current grant under pending. On occasion, I have been asked by the GMS to list it as current and to resubmit. I wouldn't leave it off. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nichols, Nicole<xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> wrote: >> Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on >> whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I >> have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- >> some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked >> around my institution -- some departments remove the current >> submission from the pending section when submitting other support for >> a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be >> "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. >> >> >> >> Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! >> >> >> >> -Nicole Nichols, MPA >> >> Certified Research Administrator >> >> xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu >> >> >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >> ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 15:57:25 -0500 > From: Mike McCallister<xxxxxx@GRANTSTREETSERVICES.COM> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > Likely that was from the Department of Redundancy Department. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List > [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Heidi Davis > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:38 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > It seems redundant to include the current application as pending, but like > Mike, I've also been asked by NIH to add it. > > Heidi Davis, Ph.D. > Director, Grants and Sponsored Programs > Mercy Hall, Rm 106 > Loyola University New Orleans > 6363 St. Charles Avenue > New Orleans, LA 70118 > (504) 864-7244 > (504) 864-7255 (direct) > xxxxxx@loyno.edu > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List > [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Mike Imbalzano > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:27 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > I always list the current grant under pending. On occasion, I have been > asked by the GMS to list it as current and to resubmit. I wouldn't leave it > off. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nichols, Nicole<xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> > wrote: >> Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on >> whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I >> have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- >> some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked >> around my institution -- some departments remove the current >> submission from the pending section when submitting other support for >> a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be >> "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. >> >> >> >> Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! >> >> >> >> -Nicole Nichols, MPA >> >> Certified Research Administrator >> >> xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu >> >> >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >> ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via > our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link > in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via > our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link > in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:00:11 +0000 > From: Charles Hathaway<xxxxxx@EINSTEIN.YU.EDU> > Subject: NIH abstracts > > Will an abstract that is way over 30 lines get an error at NIH? I'm not seeing that anymore but am concerned about problems later. > > Has anyone had a proposal rejection AFTER acceptance on Commons because a human discovered>30 lines in abstract?? > > Thanks > > Charlie Hathaway > > > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:53:59 +0000 > From: "Gray,Stephanie"<xxxxxx@UFL.EDU> > Subject: Re: Question on Other Support > > The PHS 398 forms instructions at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/phs398/phs398.pdf section 4.6.1 on page I-38 states " Neither the application under consideration nor the current PHS award for this project should be listed as Other Support. " > > Stephanie > Stephanie Gray > Assistant Director > Division of Sponsored Research > University of Florida > Phone: 352/273-4062 > Email: xxxxxx@ufl.edu > http://www.research.ufl.edu/research/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Donahue, Sherie (LLU) > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:44 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > We had been told in the past by GMS to leave it off, so it may vary depending on the person. However, if you list the current grant on the Other Support, wouldn't you also have to say that the scientific overlap is 100%? :) > > Sherie Donahue, MS, CRA - Electronic Research Specialist LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY | Office of the Vice President for Research Affairs Loma Linda, CA 92350 > (909) 651-5098 or (909) 558-1000, x83911· (909) 558-0244 (fax) · xxxxxx@llu.edu The difficult we do immediately. The impossible takes a little longer. - motto of the US Army Corps of Engineers during WWII Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Mike Imbalzano > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 11:27 AM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Question on Other Support > > I always list the current grant under pending. On occasion, I have been asked by the GMS to list it as current and to resubmit. I wouldn't leave it off. > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Nichols, Nicole<xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu> wrote: >> Other Support question - is there a specific policy/practice on >> whether to include the current submission on Pending Other Support? I >> have a JIT request and am gathering OS for approx. 40 key personnel- >> some have this submission on their pending and some don't. I've asked >> around my institution -- some departments remove the current >> submission from the pending section when submitting other support for >> a JIT for that particular submission (considering other support to be >> "other" than te application in question -- others leave it on. >> >> >> >> Just wondering if there is a "best practice" - thanks! >> >> >> >> -Nicole Nichols, MPA >> >> Certified Research Administrator >> >> xxxxxx@dom.wustl.edu >> >> >> >> ====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >> ====================================================================== > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:05:58 +0000 > From: "Nadler, Elsa"<xxxxxx@UTOLEDO.EDU> > Subject: Re: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Jane, Thank you! I am even at this moment on the phone with them. Elsa > > Elsa Nadler > 419.383.5302 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of McGlade, Jane F CTR US USA MEDCOM WRAIR > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 2:02 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > It has been my experience that unintelligible or machine language errors require you to consult the grants.gov help desk. On a recent submission we had two similarly strange errors and it turned out one number we entered on the R&R budget form was too large. I actually tried to look up the error from a list of common errors and was misled to think we had to redo the entire proposal; but the help desk's guidance was to reduce the number on our budget and list the true number in our budget justification. Hope that helps and hope you get the typically great help from the help desk. (too much help? No such thing!) > > Jane F. McGlade, Manager > Sponsored Research > Walter Reed Army Inst of Research > BLDG 503 Room 2W125 > PH: 301-319-2049 > Fax: 301-319-9810 > Cell: 240-494-6378 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nadler, Elsa > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:14 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > > > > Elsa G. Nadler > > Director of Grants Development > > 3000 Arlington Avenue > > Mail Stop 1020 > > Toledo, OH 43614 > > Ph: 419.383.5302 > > Fax: 419.383.4262 > > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu > > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org<blockedhttp://www.healthresearch.org> (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help<blockedhttp://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help> ====================================================================== > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:09:10 -0700 > From: "Haverstock, Cindy A"<xxxxxx@BANNERHEALTH.COM> > Subject: Re: Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > I received similar error messages when we had entries in the SF424 Non-Construction budget page where we should have just left them blank. After I went and took out various things, then it went through. If you notice below you have two errors for each of a certain line and column designation. So when I took things out of fields in the budget pages, it made the second one disappear too. > > Cindy Haverstock > Grants Manager > Grants Strategy Development and Administration > Banner Health > 1441 North 12th Street > Phoenix, AZ 85006-2837 > Phone: 602-747-8136 > Fax: 602-747-4185 > > Our Mission: "We exist to make a difference in people's lives through excellent patient care." > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Sisco, Stephanie L. > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:37 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Hi Elsa, > > Had you started to complete the R&R form but then ended up needing the modular? I received similar types of errors recently, and once I completely deleted all of my entries on the R&R and pulled it back oner (and then completed the modular), the submission went through fine. > > Good luck! > Stephanie > ________________________________________ > From: Research Administration List [xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nadler, Elsa [xxxxxx@UTOLEDO.EDU] > Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2012 1:14 PM > To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org > Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov errors--unintelligible > > Has anyone seen anything like this? What does it mean??? It appears to have to do with the budget pages, but I see nothing wrong. > > Help! And thanks, Elsa > > > Error:Schema validation failed > > DefaultValidationHandler found 6 problems: > > 6 Errors: > > 1: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-maxInclusive-valid: Value '1100' is not facet-valid with respect to maxInclusive '999' for type 'null'. > > 2: (line 2 column 58996) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '1100' of element 'RR_Budget:CumulativeNoofTrainees' is not valid. > > 3: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 4: (line 2 column 102862) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > 5: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-minLength-valid: Value '' with length = '0' is not facet-valid with respect to minLength '1' for type 'null'. > > 6: (line 2 column 102961) cvc-type.3.1.3: The value '' of element 'RR_Budget:Description' is not valid. > > > Elsa G. Nadler > Director of Grants Development > 3000 Arlington Avenue > Mail Stop 1020 > Toledo, OH 43614 > Ph: 419.383.5302 > Fax: 419.383.4262 > e-mail: xxxxxx@utoledo.edu > > > ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > > ====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help > ====================================================================== > > ------------------------------ > > End of RESADM-L Digest - 8 Feb 2012 to 9 Feb 2012 (#2012-37) > ************************************************************ -- Marina Aloyets Pre-Award Officer Office of Research& Sponsored Programs Montclair State University 1 Normal Avenue, College Hall 309 Montclair, NJ 07043 xxxxxx@mail.montclair.edu 973.655.5367 (tel) 973.655.5150 (fax) ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ======================================================================
