I disagree. There are two separate time frames--an "error correction window" and a separate "application viewing window. Thus, we have a total of four days, but only the first two can be used to correct errors/warnings. The second two are to be used to correct graphics, formatting etc errors. If this were not the case, why have a second two day window. Please see excerpt below: When does the "error correction window" clock start ticking? After January 8, the "error correction window" will be the two business days (Mon.-Fri., excluding Federal holidays) that follow the receipt deadline of the Funding Opportunity Announcement. For example, if your receipt deadline is Tuesday, February 5, 2008, then the "error correction window" begins on Wednesday, February 6 and ends at 5:00 p.m. local time on Thursday, February 7. Does this change effect how much time I have to view my application in eRA Commons? No. The "error correction window" comes into play before you have an assembled application. The two business day "application viewing window" to check your assembled application in eRA Commons remains unchanged. Can I still use the "error correction window" to address identified Warnings if my application is assembled and placed in eRA Commons? Yes. This practice has not changed. To ensure you have one and only one application go forward, it is best to Reject the current assembled application and then submit your corrected application. This is especially important if you are changing PD/PI or application title information. -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org]On Behalf Of Donna A. DeLuca Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:17 PM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] NIH gets tough with corrections The two day viewing/error correction window is one and the same. In other words, once your application is available in eRA Commons you have two days to view it and, if necessary, correct any errors and/or warnings. Anytime you submit an application after the due date you MUST include a cover letter. ______________________________________ Donna DeLuca Grant Administrator, Office of Sponsored Programs Health Research, Inc One University Place Rensselaer, NY 12144-3447 xxxxxx@healthresearch.org PH (518) 431-1261 FAX (518) 431-1234 www.hrinet.org "McCabe, Jeanne" <xxxxxx@BC W.EDU> To Sent by: Research xxxxxx@hrinet.org Administration cc List <xxxxxx@hrinet. Subject org> Re: [RESADM-L] NIH gets tough with corrections 12/05/2007 01:07 PM Please respond to Research Administration Discussion List <xxxxxx@hrinet. org> Yes, I'm confused. How does the five day window (now two days) relate to our two day viewing period? Hypothetically - Does this mean if I submit a grant at 4:59 p.m. on deadline day (and it clears grants.gov edits so I have the grants ID #) but then errors out when it gets to NIH that I have two days to resubmit it? And THEN two days to view it (and resubmit it again if necessary) to correct other "fatal" errors? And in either, neither or both of those two instances in which I hit "submit" after 5 p.m. on the deadline do I have to include a cover letter? -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Bloomberg, Robert Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:21 AM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] NIH gets tough with corrections Don't we have the two day period after error corrections are done to view the package and make and format/typo/graphics changes? -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org]On Behalf Of Charlie Hathaway Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 12:00 PM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: [RESADM-L] NIH gets tough with corrections NIH now says we only have a 2 day post deadline correction window and all corrections must be in response to errors/warnings. The latter idea is, as far as I know, appearing in an actual NIH Guide notice for the first time. This suggests that there may be some enforcement. So...what do you say to the PI who discovers that his error free/ warning free application sitting on Commons has an ugly misspelling in the title or abstract? Or attached the wrong references!!?? Question: Is there any difference between what constitutes an acceptable "correction" BEFORE the deadline vs AFTER the deadline? The spirit behind NOT-OD-08-018 seems to be the desire to speed up the process of getting proposals to review. Thus, perhaps the real focus here is on shenanigans during the post-deadline period. Certainly, the requirement to actually identify your errors and warnings being corrected only applies to cover letters in applications submitted after the deadline. Charlie ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== *********** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *********** This transmission may contain confidential information. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy this material. ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================
