Re: NIH gets tough with corrections Donahue, Sherie (LLU) 05 Dec 2007 13:22 EST
Dear Charlie, It has been my understanding that from the start NIH has stated the error correction window was to address errors and warnings generated once the grant was in their system, and not to allow the PI to continue editing the proposal after the grant was submitted (especially if the re-submission is after the deadline). We have been telling our PIs that from the start. As to your question, you can tell the PIs that they will be taking a gamble to have their application rejected by the Signing Official AFTER the deadline and resubmitted as NIH may not accept it. However, it seems that the outcome, at the worst, is that the PI would just have to submit the grant the next round. I suggest that if your PI does wish to take the gamble, that reason for the rejection is clearly explained in his/her revised cover letter as the reason why. For my part, I am glad that NIH is beginning to narrow the correction window as it may help us teach our notoriously late PIs lessons. Sherie Donahue eRA Systems Coordinator Loma Linda University -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Hathaway Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 9:00 AM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: [RESADM-L] NIH gets tough with corrections NIH now says we only have a 2 day post deadline correction window and all corrections must be in response to errors/warnings. The latter idea is, as far as I know, appearing in an actual NIH Guide notice for the first time. This suggests that there may be some enforcement. So...what do you say to the PI who discovers that his error free/ warning free application sitting on Commons has an ugly misspelling in the title or abstract? Or attached the wrong references!!?? Question: Is there any difference between what constitutes an acceptable "correction" BEFORE the deadline vs AFTER the deadline? The spirit behind NOT-OD-08-018 seems to be the desire to speed up the process of getting proposals to review. Thus, perhaps the real focus here is on shenanigans during the post-deadline period. Certainly, the requirement to actually identify your errors and warnings being corrected only applies to cover letters in applications submitted after the deadline. Charlie ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================