Re: [RESADM-L] FFATA on Incremental Subawards
Bobbie Ursin 28 Oct 2021 12:04 EST
Meagan,
I would say don't mark it, until you do a subsequent amendment authorizing funding, which does meet the reporting threshold.
Bobbie Ursin
________________________________________
From: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org <xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org> on behalf of McKerrow, Maegan <xxxxxx@SHSU.EDU>
Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2021 9:57:30 AM
To: 'xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org'
Subject: [RESADM-L] FFATA on Incremental Subawards
Good morning,
When issuing a subaward using the FDP templates and the cumulative total of the subaward doesn’t reach the FFATA threshold until year 2 should you mark that it is subject to FFATA review in year one? It seems like a simple question but I am stuck on it.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Maegan
- = - = - = - = - = - = -
This email was sent to xxxxxx@NAU.EDU via the Research Administrator's mailing list.
To unsubscribe from RESADM-L, go to https://lists.healthresearch.org and go into the Account Settings area.
List archives are available at: https://lists.healthresearch.org/resadm-l
To change your settings (such as Digest Mode or to temporarily suspend list emails): https://lists.healthresearch.org