Fwd: Dream Version of the PHS 398 Application Packet Denise Clark 27 Apr 1999 11:09 EST
>What do I think the dream PHS 398 would be like? To be quick to the point, >my dream 398 would be concerned about the research and the research only. I >just took a look at the TRAM iPDF forms (http://tram.east.asu.edu/) to >remind myself just how much redundant material is asked for proposal to >proposal. > >Imagine the day when NIH and the rest of the federal agencies go forward >with the Federal Commons (http://www.fedcommons.gov/) and the whole concept >behind Professional and Organizational Profiles (both profiles are being >tested by NIH with FDP schools). When this happens, the following will be >true: > >Form AA (Face Page) would cut over half of the information (most of it >relates to organizational and PI information). With that, AA could be >combined with Form II, the checklist--to create a true Face Page that would >provide better overall summary information for reviewers both at NIH and at >the institutions that are applying. > >Form FF (the biosketch), as we know it today, would cease to exist. Instead, >via the professional profiles in a federal database, reviewers would have >access to a true summary of the PI's and other key members on the proposal's >abilities. In addition, imagine the amount of research could be done in the >time saved from researchers all of the country constantly reformatting their >biosketch from proposal to proposal. > >Form GG (other support) would, for the same reasons, cease to exist. > >Form HH (Facilities) - If the professional profiles are designed well, they >could include a facilities component. The PI could simply indicate what >portions of the facilities they have available would actually be used by the >proposal in question. > >Form JJ (Personnel Report for Continuations) - Professional profiles strike >again, reducing six columns to two. > >Form KK (Personal Data) would also absolutely cease to exist. > >The reason I bring this up is because I think it is important that faculty >buy into this as well, and if they do buy in, push it when the opportunities >arise, such as membership on an NIH Committee that is looking at >reformatting the 398. Maybe the committee might agree that the resources >that could be used to reformat the 398 should instead be funneled into the >development of the Federal Commons. > >Just an idea. > >Erin > >************* >Erin B. Lindsay >User Liaison, Research Admin. >Caltech >(626) 395-3596 >(626) 568-1274 (fax) >xxxxxx@caltech.edu ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================