Re: NIH Modular Grants Peter J. Dolce 14 Jan 1999 18:17 EST
We've submitted two or three modular grants and have asked PI's for detailed budgets to check salaries and the other things that other respondents have listed. So far as I can see, this is one of those streamlining devices that streamlines the sponsor's work but not the applicant's. Pat Hawk wrote: > Hi Jane, > > We out here in Duck Country (Univ. of Oregon) have made an announcement > about the availability of modular grants via our office listserve, but > haven't worked out how we're going to handle them yet. We're wrestling > with the questions you raise; I'm still not sure how we can avoid asking > for a detailed budget for our internal processing. Seems to me we still > have to know if there are graduate students on the budget (tuition > remission issue), in addition to other things like subcontracts and > equipment. I think we also need to be assured that the PI has thought > about all of his/her costs as a "check" to ensure that the budget matches > the technical narrative (I get hung up on the A-110 language that says > the budget is the financial expression of a project). The institution > continues to have a responsibility to submit an appropriate application, > even if NIH doesn't want an itemized budget. > > This reminds me very much of Phase II of the Federal Demonstration > Project when FDP schools were given the expanded authorities that all > colleges and universities now enjoy thanks to A-110 revisions (no-cost > extensions, rebudgeting, etc.). These FDP schools still had to have an > OPAS/IPAS type system in place to do these things--the difference was > that the institution approved them instead of the funding agency. There > was no change in the "paperwork" or process involved at UVa (where I had > my FDP experience). There still had to be a system in place to review > and approve those changes, and there still had to be a justification for > these actions even though the sponsor didn't care to know about them. > > I'll be interested to hear what others say about this. > > By the way, I think the Scarlett O'Hara method is a great philosophy to > follow. Beats the heck out of the Rhett Butler method. > > Pat Hawk > Sponsored Projects Administrator > Research Services and Administration 106 Riverfront Research Park > voice: 541/346-2504 > fax: 541/346-5138 > internet: xxxxxx@oregon.uoregon.edu > > ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ > Subject: NIH Modular Grants > Author: Research Administration Discussion List <xxxxxx@hrinet.org> at > GATEWAY > Date: 1/14/99 12:37 PM > > After the next big NIH deadline on February 1, the new era of modular grants > is upon us. I'm wondering if any of you have given thought to how you are > going to handle these, particularly at the proposal end. Will you required > detailed budgets or not? Are you planning on having any special faculty > awareness programs regarding the modular grants? Are you planning on > putting any special procedures into effect for modular grants? Or, do you > just want to get through February 1 and think about modular grants later > (aka the Scarlett O'hara syndrome, of which I am chronically afflected...)? > > Admittedly, the NIH Guide announcement was fairly recent, but I was just > curious if any of you had given this much thought yet. > > Hoping all of you in the cold country are staying warm... > > Jane > > Jane A. Youngers > Director > Office of Grants Management > University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio > 7703 Floyd Curl Drive > San Antonio TX 78284 > voice: 210-567-2333 > fax: 210-567-2344 > email: xxxxxx@uthscsa.edu > > ============================================================================= > > ============================================================================= -- Peter J. Dolce, Ph.D., Director Office of Research Support Services Meharry Medical College Nashville, TN 37208 P (615) 327 6703 F (615) 327 6716 ============================================================================