Re: proposal review Dr. Diane Jacobs 23 May 1996 10:06 EST
Reply to: RE>proposal review Reasons for a central university office are not philosophical, they are legal. Awards are made to an institution on behalf of one or more faculty members to carry out research or complete a particular project. The institution is the responsible party, and a central office is delegated the responsibility to enter into such an agreement with the agency. In other words, the central office speaks for the institution in agreeing to the contract (a grant is legally a contract). It also is responsible to the institution to ensure that the terms and conditions of the contract are acceptable to the university and comply with other other applicable law such as state law for state institutions. It is responsible to the agency to ensure that the institution complies with specific agency requirements (such as animal care and use assurances and human subject assurances). It is particularly important that research contracts with private industry be reviewed centrally to ensure that terms and conditions are consistent with university policies and consistent from contract to contract because the expectations and assumptions of private industry and universities are frequently different and agreements are not always in the univerisity's interest (although faculty members may think so). In addition it is important to ascertain centrally that that appropriate administrative offices haveapproved the availability of resources - personnel, space, equipment. That's a shortened version - but I hope that the question does not mean that there is a serious discussion about decentralizing the process at your institution! Diane Jacobs VP for Research and Graduate Studies University of Central Florida -------------------------------------- Date: 5/22/96 9:13 PM To: Dr. Diane Jacobs From: Research Administration Discus Received: by adm.ucf.edu; 22 May 1996 21:13:05 U Received: by gate1.health.state.ny.us; Wed, 22 May 1996 20:24:38 -0400 Message-Id: <xxxxxx@gate1.health.state.ny.us> Received: by gate1.health.state.ny.us; Wed, 22 May 1996 20:24:38 -0400 Received: by gate1.health.state.ny.us; Wed, 22 May 1996 20:24:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 17:20:26 -0500 Reply-To: Research Administration Discussion Group <xxxxxx@health.state.ny.us> Sender: Research Administration Discussion Group <xxxxxx@health.state.ny.us> From: Research Administration Discussion Group <xxxxxx@health.state.ny.us> X-From: "Martha M. Taylor" <xxxxxx@MAIL.AUBURN.EDU> Subject: proposal review X-To: xxxxxx@albnydh2.health.state.ny.us To: Multiple recipients of list RESADM-L <xxxxxx@health.state.ny.us> Dear Colleagues: A philosophical question for general discussion: Why should a central university office review and approve proposals before they are submitted to external sponsors? ---------------------------------------------------------- Martha M. Taylor, Director (334) 844-4438 Contracts and Grants Administration FAX (334) 844-5953 307 Samford Hall Auburn University, AL 36849-5131 xxxxxx@mail.auburn.edu