Compenstion for Injury to Human Subjects Barbara Gray 15 Feb 1996 14:07 EST
I need some very fast help on institutional policy regarding compensation of human subjects injured during participation in an approved research study (I am meeting with the provost mid-day Friday to discuss this). Here is our situation: We are a liberal arts institution. One of our PE and Health professors plans to study ways to prevent or lessen the incidence of a certain type of knee injury in female high school soccer players. The intervention is a specially designed exercise program to strengthen the knee. Our professor is collaborating with researchers at the local medical school (we are not affiliated in any legal way with the medical school). Initial exams and assessments will be conducted by the medical school researchers at the medical school. The exercise program will be run by our professor on our campus. Both IRB's have determined the project to be minimal risk and qualified for expedited review under the "exercise by healthy volunteers" criterion. Because the study involves investigators from the two institutions and will take place partially on each campus, we felt that both IRBs needed to review the project. (We are Single Project Assurance; they are Multiple, so they cannot accept an IRB review done by an SPA institution). We want only one informed consent form for each participant and have worked to develop language that is agreeable to both IRBs. The only remaining problem has to do with language regarding compensation for injuries. The medical school would like us to include the following: "...in the event of injury directly arising out of participation in the study, the College of Charleston and/or the [medical school name] will provide reasonable medical care not otherwise covered by third party (health insurance company) payments..." We do not view this as an IRB issue, but rather as an institutional policy issue. The IRB's role at this point seems to be one of making sure the investigator provides accurate information about institutional policy in the consent form. The College's legal counsel feels that this clause would create a contract to provide medical care even if the injury was not a result of our negligence. Further, it does not clearly state how costs of such care would be distributed between the two institutions (which the medical school feels would be decided on a case-by-case basis after the fact and depending on the injury, where it occurred, and what treatment was necessary), nor does it provide any limit to coverage or address the issue of responsibility or non-responsibility of the college for deductibles and co-payments for third party insurance. This seems to be inordinate exposure for an institution of our type, especially in our litigious society, and we have no pot of funds to cover this type of expense. Unlike the medical university, we cannot offer "free" medical care on our campus (we only have a small student infirmary). We do have liability insurance which covers injury in the case of our negligence, but we do not have "contract insurance." Please tell me how you would handle this type of project. Do you have an institutional policy that addresses payment for injury during research? If so, what is it? If you offer care in non-negligent cases, where does the money come from? Are their limits on the amount you will pay? Do you require your subjects to have their own health insurance? Do you tell your subjects that no care is available through your institution? What kinds of problems do you see if the medical university says they will provide care for injuries on their premises but we say that we will provide no compensation or services for injuries sustained on our campus? What impact would this have on the research? I will be most grateful for any help you can give so I can go to the Provost with some good suggestions. Barbara H. Gray Telephone: 803-953-5673 Director of Sponsored Programs FAX: 803-953-1434 University of Charleston, SC e-mail: xxxxxx@cofc.edu Charleston, South Carolina 29424