I would appreciate responses and reactions to OPRR's Rport dated January 10,
1995.

It appears that OPRR is essentially imposing "de nobo" review of all IRB
protocols on an annual basis.   Having a primary reviewer review the entire
protocol, any amendments, and other information provided by the inveestigator
is essentially a full review by a subcommittee of one.  I am interested in
how other institutions are responding to the guidance provided.

Any comments will be appreciated.  I eill post a summary of the information
once I have some responses.

Thanks!

Phil -

**************************************************************
Philip V. Spina, CRA
Director, Office of Research and Sponsored Programs
Wright State University
122 Allyn Hall
Dayton, Ohio 45435
(v) 513-873-2425
(f) 513-873-3781
xxxxxx@desire.wright.edu
**************************************************************