The Misconduct-in-Science regulations stipulate a two-step process for
exploration of an allegation and a decision about it.  The first step is
"inquiry;"  the second is "investigation."
 "Inquiry" is defined in PHS regs as information gathering and initial
factfinding to determine whether an allegation or apparent intance of
misconduct in science warrants an investigation.
 "Investigation" is defined as the formal examination and evaluation of
all relevant facts to determine if misconduct has occurred.

Seems clear on the surface of it, doesn't it?  But in actuality, and
especially in light of the career implications of an investigation, our
faculty struggle with what is inquiry and what is investigation.  Could any of
your campuses provide me with more distinct definitions, lists of tasks for
each, "clinical signs" of each, or other nuts-and-bolts ways you distinguish
inquiry from investigation?  Thanks in advance for your assistance.
 //Celia
................................................................
Celia S. Walker, Director
Regulatory Compliance Office
608 University Services Center
Colorado State University
Ft. Collins, CO  80523
TEL:303/491-1563         FAX:303/491-1958
INTERNET:xxxxxx@vines.colostate.edu