Re: Allowability of PPE on Sponsored Awards
Murphy, Chris
(20 May 2020 09:28 EST)
|
Re: Allowability of PPE on Sponsored Awards
Michael Spires
(20 May 2020 09:43 EST)
|
Re: Allowability of PPE on Sponsored Awards Sears, Heather (20 May 2020 10:03 EST)
|
Re: Allowability of PPE on Sponsored Awards
Bonnie Kwit
(20 May 2020 10:05 EST)
|
Re: Allowability of PPE on Sponsored Awards
Gretchen Davis Richey
(27 May 2020 16:16 EST)
|
If PPE is being purchased by a central (EH&S?) office and distributed to labs, then it should be considered an indirect cost. If faculty need to purchase PPE themselves in order for their group members to conduct research, then it is necessary for the research to be conducted in that lab and should be allocated among the PI's projects using the same rational methodology that other items such as gloves, plastics, common-use chemicals, etc are allocated. If specific PPE is required to conduct a specific activity (i.e. interviews with human subjects) for a specific award, then it should be charged to that specific award. The vast majority of agencies/awards allow rebudgeting between cost categories, and nowhere is PPE defined as an unallowable cost, so I wouldn't worry about it not being specifically called out in a budget justification. Some federal agencies are allowing federal funds to be used for donation of PPE to hospitals--why on earth wouldn't they allow it for research to be conducted on a project? If your university is demanding that PPE be treated as an indirect cost, I would say that your university should either be providing the PPE to labs or providing PIs with the additional funds required to purchase the PPE. You put PIs in a very difficult situation if you tell them PPE has to be treated as an indirect cost and then don't give them the funds from the indirect cost pool to purchase the PPE. Heather Heather Sears, PhD Contracts & Grants Manager UCSD Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry Urey Hall Addition 2050 858-534-3574 -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> on behalf of Michael Spires <xxxxxx@OAKLAND.EDU> Reply-To: Research Administration Discussion List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 at 7:43 AM To: "xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG" <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Allowability of PPE on Sponsored Awards Really? I'd argue that PPE is at least as allocable to a specific project as routine lab supplies and chemicals are. And in your last sentence, did you mean PIs or program staff? Michael (He/him/his) (248) 370-2207 xxxxxx@oakland.edu Oakland University has taken steps to slow the spread of COVID-19. Nevertheless, the Research Office is available to faculty and staff for all the research development, proposal submission, and award management services that we routinely provide; please reach out to us through email (first preference) or phone. -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> On Behalf Of Murphy, Chris Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 10:29 To: xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Allowability of PPE on Sponsored Awards Our current position is, because PPE items cannot be assigned to specific projects with a high degree of accuracy, they should be treated as an indirect cost. For projects that required special protective equipment because of the nature of the experiment, those charges would still be allowable. But PPE is not an allowable direct charge to grants in response to COVID-19. PI's are already pushing back regarding this matter. ############################ To unsubscribe from the RESADM-L list: write to: mailto:xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG or click the following link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.healthresearch.org/scripts/wa-HLTHRES.exe?SUBED1=RESADM-L&A=1__;!!Mih3wA!QqJfkWz4-K3P5UYw6Lfm4VXHiha5Vob6dBemg_RKkkpEBtBZYqxGncuCOhQpdg$ ############################ To unsubscribe from the RESADM-L list: write to: mailto:xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG or click the following link: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.healthresearch.org/scripts/wa-HLTHRES.exe?SUBED1=RESADM-L&A=1__;!!Mih3wA!QqJfkWz4-K3P5UYw6Lfm4VXHiha5Vob6dBemg_RKkkpEBtBZYqxGncuCOhQpdg$ ############################ To unsubscribe from the RESADM-L list: write to: mailto:xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG or click the following link: http://lists.healthresearch.org/scripts/wa-HLTHRES.exe?SUBED1=RESADM-L&A=1