Re: NIH NHLBI R01 Award - Inflationary Increases Cut Susan Pugl (05 Sep 2019 16:44 EST)
|
Re: NIH NHLBI R01 Award - Inflationary Increases Cut
Vicki Krell
(05 Sep 2019 17:23 EST)
|
Re: NIH NHLBI R01 Award - Inflationary Increases Cut
Andrea Buford
(06 Sep 2019 08:48 EST)
|
Re: NIH NHLBI R01 Award - Inflationary Increases Cut
Amy Cuhel-Schuckers
(06 Sep 2019 14:30 EST)
|
Re: NIH NHLBI R01 Award - Inflationary Increases Cut
Tucker, Shawn
(06 Sep 2019 14:35 EST)
|
Re: NIH NHLBI R01 Award - Inflationary Increases Cut
Bonnie Kwit
(09 Sep 2019 07:57 EST)
|
Re: NIH NHLBI R01 Award - Inflationary Increases Cut Susan Pugl 05 Sep 2019 16:44 EST
I agree that the rule is ridiculous. As it stands, personnel are expected to pledge X% of their effort to a project, and we are expected to cover their salaries for that effort. If realistic wage increases are not allowed, we are then being asked to make a decision: either reduce effort or cost share. The standard FOAs for R01s, R21s, etc., state that cost sharing is not required. So while NOT-OD-12-036 is in effect, we will continue to use an average of the salaries we honestly anticipate having the pay from a grant's budget. ############################ To unsubscribe from the RESADM-L list: write to: mailto:xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG or click the following link: http://lists.healthresearch.org/scripts/wa-HLTHRES.exe?SUBED1=RESADM-L&A=1