Good morning colleagues!

I am writing to find out if any of you are aware of any instances where an award said that program income was to be treated using the additive method and the grants official then waived the requirement entirely via a separate communication. My understanding is that there are only three alternative treatments (deductive, additive and cost-share/match) and that the requirement cannot be waived, even by a grant specialist. But if you have seen this I would be very interested to hear about your experience.

Thanks all-

Michael Pelletier| Vice President, Director Office of Sponsored Programs | Domestic Programs | EDC
43 Foundry Avenue, Waltham, MA 02453 | direct: 617.618.2227 | main: 617.969-7100
Web: edc.org<https://go.edc.org/worldwide> | Facebook: EDC<https://www.facebook.com/edc.worldwide> | Twitter: edctweets<http://twitter.com/EDCtweets>

= = = = = =

 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the
 "RESADM-L" link under "Sponsored Programs").

 A link directly to helpful tips:  http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help

= = = = = =