Changing institutions
James Austin
(11 Jul 2014 09:06 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Natasha Stark
(11 Jul 2014 10:19 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
James Austin
(11 Jul 2014 11:37 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Schultz, Lori Ann Mcallester - (lschultz)
(11 Jul 2014 12:51 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Charna Howson
(11 Jul 2014 13:48 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Theresa Defino
(11 Jul 2014 13:54 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Nancy Schlesiger
(11 Jul 2014 11:54 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Minessa Konecky
(11 Jul 2014 10:22 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Michael Spires
(11 Jul 2014 10:30 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Susan E Held
(11 Jul 2014 10:32 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Elizabeth Cline
(11 Jul 2014 10:44 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Baker03, Karen
(11 Jul 2014 14:21 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions Lawrence Waxler (11 Jul 2014 11:00 EST)
|
Re: Changing institutions
Trish Brock
(11 Jul 2014 18:10 EST)
|
James, Keep in mind that while awards are often made based on the qualifications of the PI, it is the institution to which the award is made, not to the PI. From that perspective then, grant-making agencies generally leave it up to the discretion of the institution to propose or not propose a replacement PI in cases where the original PI leaves. Such a replacement would generally have to be pre-approved by the funder. However, it has been my experience over many years that we would not stand in the way of a transfer in cases where the PI was the only supported staff member. On larger multi-staffed programs though, we would most likely propose a replacement. We would consider all scenarios to be routine and non-contentious. Larry ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Larry Waxler, Director Office of Sponsored Programs University of Southern Maine 1 Chamberlain Avenue P.O. Box 9300 Portland, ME 04104-9300 Telephone: 207-780-4413 Telefax: 207-780-4927 >>> James Austin <xxxxxx@AAAS.ORG> 7/11/2014 10:06 AM >>> Hello all. I'm investigating the question of what happens when an investigator changes institutions—specifically, taking grants and grant-bought equipment to the new institution. I've read up on official policies (mostly at NIH; more reading to do)--and NIH policy makes it sound like a lot depends on the discretion of the institution you're leaving. However, I have the impression (from limited real-life experience) that this is fairly routine. What's your experience? Do you find that institutions readily relinquish grants and grant-bought equipment when investigators move on? Or is this something that's often contentious? Thanks, Jim ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ======================================================================