Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Terri Fayle
(19 Aug 2011 15:26 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Nicole Braman
(19 Aug 2011 15:47 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Legeai, Randall J
(19 Aug 2011 16:01 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Terri Fayle
(22 Aug 2011 08:41 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
rdewey@mcdaniel.edu
(22 Aug 2011 09:19 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Riggs, Mitzi
(22 Aug 2011 09:29 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
White-Jones, Teresa
(22 Aug 2011 09:53 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget rdewey@mcdaniel.edu (22 Aug 2011 09:53 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Kris Wolff
(19 Aug 2011 15:53 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Susan E Morris
(19 Aug 2011 16:24 EST)
|
Re: Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget
Carril, Matthew
(22 Aug 2011 15:32 EST)
|
Re: subrecipient invoices
Barbara DeHaven
(23 Aug 2011 07:15 EST)
|
I'm sorry, I guess I mis-spoke. I was calculating an increase in the overall rate of 5%, not a 5% increase in the rate. Robin On 8/22/11 10:29 AM, "Riggs, Mitzi" <xxxxxx@OKSTATE.EDU> wrote: >An increase of 5% on your benefit rate, makes your new benefit rate >31.5%, not 35%. > >Mitzi > >__________________________________________________________ >Mitzi M. Riggs, CRA >Research Administration Coordinator >College of Engineering, Architecture & Technology >Oklahoma State University >201 Advanced Technology Research Center, Stillwater, OK 74078 >Email: xxxxxx@okstate.edu >Phone: 405-744-6562; Fax: 405-744-3189 > >-----Original Message----- >From: Research Administration List >[mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of >xxxxxx@mcdaniel.edu >Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:19 AM >To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org >Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget > >I'm a numbers person at heart. So when looking at things like this, I >always look at the numbers first. > >Say you have a PI at 100k, 30% fringe, 20% effort, and 3% inflation rate. > >Year 1: 20,000 salary and 6,000 benefits. >Year 2: 20,600 salary and 6,180 benefits. >Year 2 with an "extra" 5% padding for benefits: 20,600 salary and 7,210 >benefits > >So a 5% increase in the fringe benefit rate is an additional 1,030 burden >to the budget. I personally have to do this to get an idea exactly what >amount of money we are discussing. > >Now, I think issue can be looked at from different viewpoints. As a state >institution, do your fringe rates vary that greatly from year to year? At >the private institutions where I have worked, they do not. At one >institution they have not yet changed since I have been here. At the other >institution the changes were less than 1%, and one year they went down and >not up. (Granted, they were self-insured, which I think made a huge >difference). I would think 5%, as used in my example above, would be >extreme. > >You also have to consider consistency. In an ideal world, applications >from the same institution to the same funding agency should use the same >calculation methods. Since it's the application stage I don't really think >cost principles apply...but it's just good business practice. > >As for fringes being negotiated on the F&A, I can not answer that >question. > >Robin > > >On 8/22/11 9:41 AM, "Terri Fayle" <xxxxxx@K-STATE.EDU> wrote: > >>This argument has been given, and I don't disagree with it. However, I >>have been in situations where the salary DID go up and the fringes ALSO >>went up. This practice is fine if one or the other goes up, but you're >>short if they both go up. >> >>The argument has also been given to increase the salaries by double what >>you normally do to cover the increase in fringes. I don't see how that's >>any different or LESS inconsistent than inflating the fringes. >> >>Is it true then, if your fringe rates on negotiated on your F&A rate >>agreement (at my previous institution they were not), those are the only >>rates you can use?? >> >>t. >> >>Terri L. Fayle >>Senior Grant Specialist >>K-State Research & Extension Proposal Services >>Waters Hall 105C >>Kansas State University >>Manhattan, KS 66506-4008 >>xxxxxx@k-state.edu >> >>Voice 785-532-7255 >>FAX 785-532-5549 >>Cell 660-238-7165 >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Randall J Legeai" <xxxxxx@TULANE.EDU> >>To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org >>Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 4:01:26 PM >>Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget >> >>If you are using a fringe *rate* (i.e. a percentage of salary), and you >>build in an annual salary escalation as most people do, your fringe >>amounts will be escalated as well. >>- Randy. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Research Administration List >>[mailto:xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org] On Behalf Of Nicole Braman >>Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 3:47 PM >>To: xxxxxx@lists.healthresearch.org >>Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Inflation of Fringe Benefits in Proposed Budget >> >>We use an inflation rate on the salary, not fringe. Although this year we >>had a significant fringe increase, so I am wondering if it isn't a valid >>practice to increase fringe as well. I am curious what others have to >>say. >> >>Nicole >> >>Terri Fayle wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> I'd be interested to hear your comments regarding inflation of fringe >>>benefits while creating a proposal budget. My institution uses a >>>published estimated rate for certain employee classes. But when the >>>charges actually hit the grant budget, it is the actual amount of >>>charges for that employee, so in most cases different than what was >>>proposed. >>> >>> Typically, no inflation is applied to fringes when creating multiple >>>year budgets. Since I'm new here, I did! It has been suggested that I >>>cannot inflate fringes because I am being inconsistent with the >>>institutional published estimated rate. I say poppycock! I used the >>>published estimated rate and added a bit! That's what you do to protect >>>your investigators budget. >>> >>> What say you?? >>> >>> Terri L. Fayle >>> Senior Grant Specialist >>> K-State Research & Extension Proposal Services Waters Hall 105C Kansas >>> State University Manhattan, KS 66506-4008 xxxxxx@k-state.edu >>> >>> Voice 785-532-7255 >>> FAX 785-532-5549 >>> Cell 660-238-7165 >>> >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >>> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >>> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >>> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >>> >>> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >>> ====================================================================== >>> >>> >> >> >>====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >>subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via >>our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" >>link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >>====================================================================== >> >> >>====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >>====================================================================== >> >> >>====================================================================== >> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including >> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available >> via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the >> "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) >> >> A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >>====================================================================== > > >====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >====================================================================== > > >====================================================================== > Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available > via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the > "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) > > A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help >====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.healthresearch.org (click on the "LISTSERV" link in the upper right corner) A link directly to helpful tips: http://tinyurl.com/resadm-l-help ======================================================================