On a related note...

Has anyone ever heard of an unscored application being funded on the
subsequent submission?  There are some data out there on ultimate success
rates of grants that were initially unscored, but these were from ancient
times of A2 and A3.  Even then, I think the %s were success on 2nd and 3rd
try and were still under 5%.  So today is it even worth resubmitting?

Charlie

> This is most helpful.  Thanks, Zoya.
>
>
> Regina Maldve, Ph.D., CRA
> Sr. Grants and Contracts Specialist
> Office of the Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies
> The University of Texas at Austin
> College of Pharmacy
> (512) 232-7511-Office
> (512) 296-4302-Mobile
>
> If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
> ~Albert Einstein
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Zoya Hamilton wrote:
>
> Hi Reg,
>
> This is the answer from our Proposal Development team:
>
> The CSR website... only states that applications are “screened” by CSR. It
> doesn’t say how. I think if anything is picked up in this vague initial
> “screening” it goes through several levels of
> review by real people. If there is any doubt, CSR also has an A2/A3
> committee that reviews the applications in question. The info that is
> helpful at this link is what CSR considers sufficient vs. insufficient
> changes to create a ‘new’ application."
>
> http://cms.csr.nih.gov/ResourcesforApplicants/OverlapEvaluation.htm
>
> Given the volume of submissions it would make sense if the initial
> screening was done by software.
>
> Zoya
>
> --
> Zoya Hamilton, CRA
> Sr. Associate Director, Research Administration
> Office of the Vice Provost
> Tufts University
> Tel (617) 636-6709
> Fax (617) 636-2917
> http://researchadmin.tufts.edu/
>
>
> Maldve Regina wrote:
>> Good Friday Morning.
>>
>> I have faculty interested in knowing how NIH will screen applications to
>> ensure that they are new submissions, and not just slapped with a new
>> title and re-formatted. NOT-OD-10-080 mentioned that the applications
>> would be screened multiple times beginning with receipt to the CSR and
>> up to the peer review. Does anyone know how this will be done? Software
>> of some kind?
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>> Reg
>> /
>> /
>> /
>> /
>> /
>> /Regina Maldve, Ph.D., CRA/
>> /Sr. Grants and Contracts Specialist/
>> /Office of the Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies/
>> /The University of Texas at Austin/
>> /College of Pharmacy/
>> /(512) 232-7511-Office/
>> /(512) 296-4302-Mobile/
>> /
>> /
>> /
>> /If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.///
>> /~Albert Einstein/
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via
>> our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
>> ======================================================================
>>
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
> via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
> ======================================================================
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
>  Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>  subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
>  via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
> ======================================================================
>

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================