|
indirect costs on DOE projects
Foy, Sharon A
(02 Sep 2010 11:56 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
Sarah Dumais
(02 Sep 2010 13:00 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
Paul Tuttle PETUTTLE
(02 Sep 2010 13:04 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
OBrien, Maryellen
(02 Sep 2010 13:12 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
Morgan, Kelly
(02 Sep 2010 13:32 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
Liana Setti
(02 Sep 2010 13:42 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
Jeanne M Wicks
(02 Sep 2010 16:43 EST)
|
|
eSNAP routing
Charlie Hathaway
(02 Sep 2010 16:54 EST)
|
|
Re: eSNAP routing Lori Wallin (02 Sep 2010 18:09 EST)
|
|
Re: eSNAP routing
Bob Beattie
(02 Sep 2010 20:26 EST)
|
|
Voluntary waiver of F&A ?
Hicks, Tammy
(03 Sep 2010 08:47 EST)
|
|
Re: Voluntary waiver of F&A ?
Cappellucci, James E.
(03 Sep 2010 08:56 EST)
|
|
Re: Voluntary waiver of F&A ?
Hicks, Tammy
(03 Sep 2010 09:04 EST)
|
|
Re: Voluntary waiver of F&A ?
Sarah Dumais
(03 Sep 2010 09:25 EST)
|
|
Re: Voluntary waiver of F&A ?
Mason, Linda
(03 Sep 2010 09:54 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
Marie Smith
(03 Sep 2010 05:53 EST)
|
|
Technology Management Office versus Office of Sponsored Programs - Poll
McNees, Andrew G.
(03 Sep 2010 14:56 EST)
|
|
Re: Technology Management Office versus Office of Sponsored Programs - Poll
Maggie Griscavage
(03 Sep 2010 15:11 EST)
|
|
Re: indirect costs on DOE projects
Ann R Shiras
(03 Sep 2010 15:18 EST)
|
Re: eSNAP routing Lori Wallin 02 Sep 2010 18:09 EST
You are correct, the ASST can prepare the entire e-SNAP but cannot route it due to the certification statement that is intended for the PI (see below from the e-SNAP User Guide). This is still much better than several years ago when the only way to assist the PI was for him/her to share their password. We prepare the entire e-SNAP documents (the PI provides the narrative) then send the PI instructions on how to review and route (screen shot from the e-SNAP with 5 easy steps). This works well for us. * * * * * 3.4.1 Certification Statement If the current reviewer is a PD/PI, when routing the eSNAP to another reviewer, the system displays a certification statement to the PD/PI with an option to agree with the statement or cancel the routing process. If the system determines that Lori A. Wallin (xxxxxx@umn.edu) Coordinator, Research Support Services Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Voice-mail: 612-625-1479 MMC 391 Mayo; 420 Delaware Street SE; Minneapolis, MN 55455 Preparing or submitting a research proposal? Please let us know at http://www.med.umn.edu/peds/research/grantadmin/home.html -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Hathaway Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:55 PM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: [RESADM-L] eSNAP routing We have delegated PI authority to various administrators to allow them to prepare eSNAP submissions in NIH eRA Commons. These administrators have the role ASST. Can the ASST with delegated access use the "Routing" feature to e.g. send the application to someone in Central Admin? It looks like only the PI can do this, which is of course not very helpful if we are trying to minimize the administrative burdens on them. Am I not understanding the system? Thanks. Charlie Hathaway ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================