|
CRA exam
Holleman, Sonia G.
(14 Jun 2010 11:47 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Wright, Kristie
(14 Jun 2010 12:01 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Holleman, Sonia G.
(30 Aug 2010 10:45 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Hall, Denise
(30 Aug 2010 11:02 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Holleman, Sonia G.
(30 Aug 2010 12:13 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Ruby Giles
(30 Aug 2010 12:30 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Printup, Tammie
(13 Sep 2010 10:56 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Sharon Smith
(14 Jun 2010 12:25 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Holleman, Sonia G.
(14 Jun 2010 12:37 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Joy Muir
(14 Jun 2010 12:40 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Candyce Lindsay
(14 Jun 2010 13:38 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Candyce Lindsay
(14 Jun 2010 13:42 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Schreiber, Hollie
(15 Jun 2010 08:13 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Holleman, Sonia G.
(15 Jun 2010 08:33 EST)
|
|
NIH New Investigator Charlie Hathaway (15 Jun 2010 08:51 EST)
|
|
Re: NIH New Investigator
Greene, Susan A
(15 Jun 2010 10:03 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Geyer, Julie
(15 Jun 2010 09:44 EST)
|
|
Re: CRA exam
Holleman, Sonia G.
(15 Jun 2010 09:48 EST)
|
Can anyone confirm (or refute) that New Investigator status (= no previous R01) confers no benefit to applicants for R03, R21, R15 etc (i.e. sub R01 level funding)? I have found explicit statements by NIH that EIS is only applicable to R01s...but what about New Investigators? thanks Charlie Hathaway ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================
