Royalties to the government
Ivona Jukic
(11 Jun 2010 10:01 EST)
|
Re: Royalties to the government
Hagen, Gary
(11 Jun 2010 11:33 EST)
|
Re: Royalties to the government Forster, Marjorie (11 Jun 2010 12:32 EST)
|
Re: Royalties to the government Forster, Marjorie 11 Jun 2010 12:32 EST
Dear Ivona: The first question I would ask is if the invention was created through a federally funded grant? My next question would be who made the invention? Created only the faculty from your institution? In that case, your institution under the Bayh-Dole Act has the right to elect to retain title to the invention in order to pursue patenting and licensing. If the invention was made jointly by your faculty and with a scientist from the federal government then that would be a jointly owned invention and both parties would have an undivided interest in that invention. Usually in this situation the agreement would state which party would take the lead in patenting and licensing the invention. Both parties would agree to share in the cost of patenting the joint invention. Just because the government funds the project from which the invention results doesn't automatically require that you pay the federal sponsor a royalty. Only if the government scientists were defined under US Patent Law as a bona fide inventor would the federal agency have ownership rights and the rights to any revenue/royalties generated from the licensing of a joint invention. Under the Bayh Dole Act the federal government that funds an invention is automatically granted a non-exclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license. Language we have used is as follows: "Any invention arising under this Agreement is subject to the retention by the U.S. Government of nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice, or have practiced, the invention throughout the world by or on behalf of the U.S. Government". Before drafting intellectual property language in an agreement I would suggest that you consult with your technology transfer folks or as someone else suggested your legal counsel. Marjorie On Jun 11, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Ivona Jukic wrote: Hi everyone, I am seeking guidance of the IP/tech transfer experts: what would be a standard operating procedure/language that addresses IP in respect to royalties in an agreement with federal government? For example, how standard is the following - in this or any foreign country in which university obtains a title to a patent or other IP rights grant, on any subject invention made solely by the federal government or jointly, university shall pay the government a royalty based on a reasonable rate. Thank you, Ivona Ivona Jukic, CRA Grants Manager Office of Sponsored Programs & Research University Library 211 University of Louisiana at Monroe Monroe, LA 71209 (p) 318.342.1476 (f) 318.342.1479 http://ulm.edu/research ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== Marjorie Forster Assistant Vice President, Research and Global Health Initiatives Office of Research and Development University of Maryland Baltimore 620 West Lexington Street, Suite 400 Baltimore, MD 21201 410-706-6631 410-706-6630 (fax) xxxxxx@umaryland.edu<mailto:xxxxxx@umaryland.edu> ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================