I would check approved and put the date of the most recent approved protocol date that you have out of the protocols that are to be listed.   At JIT I would include the detailed list of the protocols

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Zoya Hamilton
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 11:55 AM
To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
Subject: [RESADM-L] T32 grants.gov package IRB/IACUC approval date pending?

Someone at our university is preparing a competing renewal for T32 due
on May 25th (at this early date! just imagine the luxury of 12 weeks of
lead time!). Because these applications are now electronic, how do you
plan to get around the IRB/IACUC approval date of which there are
multiples? I am thinking that "pending" should be checked. Any thoughts?

On a separate note, biosketches for PD/PI's and key personnel seem to be
required in two places: in key personnel and in participating faculty
biosketches. Seems odd.

--
Zoya Hamilton, CRA
Sr. Associate Director, Research Administration
Office of the Vice Provost
Tufts University
Tel (617) 636-6709
Fax (617) 636-2917
http://researchadmin.tufts.edu/

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================