Is it safe to assume if our proposals show in eRA Commons as "Pending IRG review" that we have passed the test of such limits (e.g., no more than 10 references)?  Or can we still be notified of a "withdrawal" of application due to such errors?

-- Amy Atkerson

******************
Amy M. Atkerson
Research Coordinator
University of Kentucky
Behavioral Science/CDAR
102 Medical Behavioral Science Building
Lexington, KY  40536-0086
859/323-2643
Fax:  859/323-5350
xxxxxx@uky.edu
[Staff Senator, Precinct 7HB]

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Jon Teuber
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:43 AM
To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] challenge grants

They are definitely holding these proposals to the limitations posted.  One of
our PIs received a letter saying his proposal was removed because he had
over 10 references.  We checked and double checked, and appealed because
both the PI and co-PI had exactly 10 each.

On appeal, NIH responded that their first finding was incorrect, and that
instead the PI had over one page of references (also a limit)... that error
finding was valid.

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================