Re: Grants.gov vs Fastlane angela williams 04 Jun 2009 11:18 EST
I second all the previously mentioned features and add: FastLane is more flexible with files - you do not have to have PDFs and I've never had problems due to filenames. The grants.gov Adobe forms also require all files to be created in the same version of Adobe, which is difficult to coordinate if you are working with different departments and institutions. Some of the grants.gov limitations others have mentioned are resolved by Cayuse, but not all. Ang. Angela D. Williams, MBA, JD Center Research Administrator Texas Learning and Computation Center University of Houston 218 P.G. Hoffman Hall Houston, TX 77204-3058 713-743-4129 Fax: 713-743-1250 xxxxxx@tlc2.uh.edu -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Terri Hall Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 10:58 AM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov vs Fastlane Charlie, Here are a few features of FastLane that come to mind that are not currently in Grants.gov: 1) you can copy a budget from year to year and new budget is eligible if only salaries change; Personnel info is also copied so need not be re-entered 2) adding collaborators is a matter of selecting their institution from a drop-down list - no DUNS needed 3) ability to link collaborative proposals - they enter their info and you do yours - each submits and FastLane "magically" links them into one proposal for reviewers 4) one-click opens form needed ... no moving it anywhere first 5) Helpdesk staff actually has experience with system If others occur to me, I'll forward them. Terri ? Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. If printing, consider the double-sided option. Terri M. Hall, CRA Director, Electronic Research Administration Associate Director, Pre-Award Administration Office of Research University of Notre Dame (574) 631-7378 xxxxxx@nd.edu There is nothing like a dream to create the future. - Victor Hugo -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Hathaway Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:19 AM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: [RESADM-L] Grants.gov vs Fastlane I am giving a talk next week and anticipate being asked the question that was so common several years ago: "Why didn't they just use a system like Fastlane?" I know some of the reasons why Fastlane was not a good model for doing ALL federal grants. However, being less familiar with Fastlane than I am with Grants.gov and NIH Commons, could someone tell me some reasons why Fastlane is currently better or worse to use than S2S to Gg to NIH Commons? thanks Charlie ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================