My gut says yes. Its tidier. And have someone look over the data. As
a psyc fac we dont regularly do anything that is security issues, but
there are issues on export and access to data........

At 04:45 PM 1/21/2009, you wrote:
>Our PI (Psychology faculty) has a collaborator in the UK.  Our PI
>will collect the data from participants in the US.  The protocol
>will receive expedited review because our PI will be able to
>associate personal responses with participant identities
>(face-to-face data collection).  The collaborator will only receive
>de-identified data for analysis.  Must we enter into an Unaffiliated
>Investigator Agreement with the collaborator and have him complete
>our training program?  On one hand, it seems like a reasonable
>practice if the collaborator is going to co-publish and co-present,
>but, on the other hand, the data he receives is anonymous, and so
>where is the risk to the participants?  Thoughts?
>Thanks.
>
>Ms. Barbara H. Gray
>Director of Grants & Contracts
>Valdosta State University
>1500 North Patterson Street
>Valdosta, GA  31698-0429
>
>Telephone:  229-333-7837
>Fax:  229-245-3853
>Email:  xxxxxx@valdosta.edu
>
>
>======================================================================
>Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
>via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv
>Lists") ======================================================================

Elisabeth Sherwin, PhD
Associate Professor of Psychology
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
2801 S. University
Little Rock, AR 72204
Tel: (501) 569 3171
Fax:  (501) 569 3047

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================