We are going through this now with federal pass through & consensus among research staff & attorney is that we can't/won't amend an expired agreement.
The pass thru entity is providing us with a new sub.
Katie.

Kathryn Watkins, M.Ed., CRA
Director, Research Services &
 Sponsored Programs
The University of Akron
Chair, Research Administrators
 Certification Council
Ph: 330-972-6764
Fax: 330-972-6281

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Maggie Griscavage
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 1:56 PM
To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] expired subaward - revitalize or sign a new one?

Two years would be a bit of a stretch for me, Zoya - I'd ask for a new one.

Maggie

Zoya Hamilton wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> Our subaward with a prime institution ended two years ago, however the
> prime's grant from the NIH continued and is now in its 5th year. Now
> the prime institution wants us to revitalize the collaboration, and
> the scope of work is more of the same of what we did under the expired
> subaward. Would you accept an addendum to the expired award or sign a
> new one?
>
> Thanks for your opinions, as always,
>

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including  subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available  via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================