Thanks again for all the info Bob.

Unfortunately, I had to miss the webcast but was hoping to watch the
archive.  Does anyone know if the archive is up yet?  I looked in the
archive section of grants.gov website (under the resources section) and
it was not there.  Did they mention if this archive was going to take a
little time to get posted?

Thanks everyone

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On
Behalf Of Bob Beattie
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 11:36 AM
To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] multiple Adobe Program

Here are some useful items on this topic from the Grant.gov FAQ page
http://www.grants.gov/help/general_faqs.jsp#software
Also, see the Questions and Answers from the webcast
http://www.grants.gov/assets/WebcastQA011608.pdf

I am not sure that the problem Nancy mentions is one for Grants.gov to
fix as this is an operating issue for various computers.  On my Mac I
can open .pdf files in Professional and Reader at the same time.  Anyone
tried this with Vista? It is also an Adobe Company problem to create a
Reader version that will not be overridden by Professional.  However, as
Rick points out, if Grants.gov can make the forms open ONLY with Reader
8.1.1 then the problem is nicely solved.

While a nice "ultimate" solution is presented by Terri (and what a good
faculty recruitment tool -- come to Notre Dame and never fill out grant
applications again :} ); is not the solution we all want actually an
internal grants management system to use the System to System approach.
Then no one fills out forms or needs to keep track of versions.  Our IT
staff or our vendor will keep us up-to-date on what is needed for
submission.  No more listserv discussion and we can get back to
substantive issues.

Perhaps at a SRA or NCURA meeting, there can be a session on the Pros
and Cons of Going System to System.  There have been "how-to"
sessions.  The last issue of NCURA Magazine had a nice article by Ron
Splittgerber on how Colorado State is implementing S2S.  Yet I have not
seen anyone's suggestion that is not the way to go.  I would be very
happy to have an article for the NCURA-zine  on why a decision was made
NOT to go S2S.  I wonder what Chris found out through his survey on the
numbers of schools doing various options.

In the meantime, we can follow the good advice of our colleagues here
-- provide good training, send lots of info to faculty/staff, control
program availability, hope people read what we send them.  And hope
Grants.gov will get the Professional "blocker" to work.

Bob
------------------------------
Robert Beattie
UMich Grants.gov Liaison
Managing Senior Project Representative for Electronic Research
Administration Division of Research Development and Administration
University of Michigan
xxxxxx@umich.edu   (734) 936-1283
Learn more about Grants.gov @ UMICH
http://www.research.umich.edu/era/grants_gov/

On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Peterson, Nancy K wrote:

Has grant.gov acknowledged the Reader/Professional problem?  Does anyone
know if they are doing any thing to "fix" it?

-------------------------------------------------------

Nancy Kay Peterson, Director

Grants & Sponsored Projects (G&SP)

Winona State University

Somsen Hall 212

Winona, MN  55987

Phone: 507.457.5519

Fax:     507.457.5586

http://www.winona.edu/grants

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================