On the other hand, if the time and scope are minimal and the work done
off-site, perhaps the PI meant that she could simply work as a consultant on
the award.  Faculty guidelines generally allow consultancies on a limited
basis.

She did say she'd reduce her time, but oftentimes PIs use admin terms either
interchangeably or in a broader 'layman's' sense without regard to/knowledge
of the difference.

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of
Amy L. Taylor
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 1:56 PM
To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] wandering PI

There are more things to consider, beyond the PI salary and how much they
will be paid.

Does the project involve human subjects, or animals? Does it include funding
for students or other USFCA employees? How will any payroll or liability for
their actions be handled (such as worker's compensation?) Will any part of
the project be conducted at USFCA? Is there any international involvement
that might need export control review? What are the intellectual property
rights?

There may also be appointment issues if the faculty member becomes an
employee at another institution

On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Pamela Miller wrote:

> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 10:07:14 -0700
> From: Pamela Miller <xxxxxx@USFCA.EDU>
> Reply-To: Research Administration Discussion List <xxxxxx@hrinet.org>
> To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
> Subject: [RESADM-L] wandering PI
>
> I received an inquiry from a faculty member who cooperated in the
submission
> of a proposal to a federal agency from another institution (without going
> through channels here). This is a tenure track associate professor.
>
>
>
> The proposal was funded.
>
>
>
> I suggested that we set up a subcontract from the awarded institution to
our
> institution for a portion of her salary during the academic year.
>
>
>
> The faculty member tells me why bother since she can reduce her time at
our
> institution and become an employee of the other institution and make extra
> money without a sub. This may or may not be true, but can someone give me
> some reasons why this would be a bad idea?
>
>
>
> Pam
>
>
>
> Pamela F. Miller, Ph.D.
> Director, Office of Sponsored Projects
> The University of San Francisco
> 2130 Fulton Street
> San Francisco, CA 94117-1080
> TEL  415-422-5368
> FAX 415-422-6222
> EMAIL xxxxxx@usfca.edu
>
>
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
> via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
> ======================================================================
>

Amy L. Taylor
Grants Manager
Department of Genome Sciences
University of Washington
1705 NE Pacific Street,
Foege Building, S250-B
Seattle, WA  98195-5065
Office: 206-616-7823
Fax: 206-685-7301

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================