Interesting that folks are looking at such detail within each
application.  This survey of reviewing would be better with some
context.

I am now the eRA Editor for the NCURA Newsletter.  For my first
article, I would like to report on how the first two R01 deadlines
went.  Perhaps people would send me the following information,
directly, not through the group.  xxxxxx@umich.edu
I will summarize and post to the group -- no need to ask for your own
copy :)
Just to give some context, I have put in the UM data.

How many applications did you get for the R01 Feb 5 Submission? (75)
How many had errors? (15)
How many with errors were corrected after the deadline? (0)
How many did you reject and resubmit because the PI did not like what
got into the Commons? (18)
How many of these rejections were after the deadline? (0)
(I will try to get a report from NIH on what numbers were and what
were common errors)

How soon before the deadline did you require a copy of the application?
If you will take it in parts,
How soon for the administrative information?
in paper -- 424, budget, other paper? (7 work days)
in electronic form?
How soon for final full electronic version? (4 work days)

Do you look at the full electronic file?
all forms and all fields? (yes)
selected sections and fields?
all attachments? (no, only check that they are .pdf)

How many staff did you have involved in checking and submitting NIH
applications (2, with 2 in reserve)

Thanks much for the information.

Bob
xxxxxx@umich.edu

On Feb 21, 2007, at 11:31 AM, Vicki Krell wrote:

I’ve been looking at each and every page, each and every field and
opening literally every document.

Vicki

Vicki Krell, CRA

Sponsored Projects Site Supervisor

Office for Research and Sponsored Projects Admin.

Arizona State University

(480) 965-2171

(480) 965-1703 - fax

xxxxxx@asu.edu

From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On
Behalf Of Buel, Elizabeth J
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 9:08 AM
To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
Subject: [RESADM-L] review of electronic proposal submissions

To what extent is everyone reviewing the electronic proposal before
submission to grants.gov?

For the Feb 5 and 16 deadline our office literally opened every
document and I am wondering if it’s necessary to review to that extent.

Your feedback will be greatly appreciated.

Liz

Liz Buel
Grant & Contract Manager
Office of Sponsored Programs
University of Texas Health Science Center
at San Antonio
MSC 7828, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive
San Antonio, TX 78229-3900
210-567-2335 phone
210-567-2344 fax

====================================================================== I
nstructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

====================================================================== I
nstructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================