Re: Troublesome clinical trial clause
Robert Bienkowski 13 Oct 2006 09:48 EST
I think many IRBs would object to this language as being exculpatory.
Bob Bienkowski
--
Robert S Bienkowski, PhD
xxxxxx@att.net
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Carole Knight <xxxxxx@SLU.EDU>
> Hi everyone,
>
> We are attempting to negotiate a contract with a pharmaceutical company
> for a clinical trial. The contract contains the following clause which
> we have been advise not to accept. However, the company stands firm in
> that they will not delete it, and says that "everyone accepts this."
> I'm wondering if you do, and if you see liability red flags as we do.
> I'd appreciate any advise or suggestions as to how to proceed.
>
> "Sponsor agrees to pay for the cost of reasonable and customary medical
> treatment of any illness or injury sustained by a Study
> subject.....provided however, that Sponsor's obligations under this
> Article...shall not apply to the extent that any such costs or such
> illness or injury is attributable to.....(d) the Study subject's failure
> to comply with instructions contained in the Informed Consent executed
> by such subject or communicated to the subject by Study personnel."
>
> Any thoughts? Thanks everyone.
>
> Carole
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
> via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
> ======================================================================
======================================================================
Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================
[RESADM-L] Troublesome clinical trial clause
Carole Knight 13 Oct 2006 09:16 EST