Re: Grants.gov submission for NIH proposal Robert Beattie 26 Jun 2006 10:34 EST
Someone asked me about the statement I made in my previous note on this topic, that weekday holidays _count_ for verifying an assembled application. I found this info on the NIH Grants.gov FAQ page on rejections: http://era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/faq_check_assembled.htm 6. Are holidays included in the two business day period? Yes. If a holiday occurs on Monday through Friday, the holiday will be counted as a business day. So, Independence Day counts as one of the two days to verify and reject. In my earlier message, I asked if anyone knew how long after a rejection, that occurred after a deadline, we had to submit the corrected version. The FAQ below gives some info, one week. 4. Can the AOR/SO “Reject” the application if the two day window falls after the submission deadline? Yes, if the assembled application does not correctly reflect your submission due to a Grants.gov or eRA Commons system error. While NIH is allowing the one-week correction window to address errors and warnings, the application also can be rejected to address warnings. Remember warnings do not stop further processing. This statement seems to indicate that only "system errors" are grounds for post-deadline rejections. Other places NIH stated that "PI errors" could also be addressed in the two day window. The goal of NIH is to get good, error-free applications so I would assume this to be the case. The second sentence in the FAQ implies NIH is allowing a one-week period after the deadline to correct errors and warnings. This was the case with earlier programs, is this true now for the July submissions? Bob ------------------------------ Robert Beattie UMich Grants.gov Liaison xxxxxx@umich.edu (734) 936-1283 Learn more about Grants.gov @ UMICH http://www.research.umich.edu/era/grantsgov/ On Jun 23, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Kim Codere wrote: Yesterday, Michigan Tech submitted a proposal to NIH via grants.gov for the AREA solicitation. The proposal was accepted by eRA Commons. When the PI reviewed the grant image in Commons, he noticed a misquote in the introduction, a structure error, a figure error and some typos. Is this an acceptable reason for us to reject the application and resubmit since it is prior to the submission deadline (6/25/06)? I have contacted NIH but I have not heard back from them yet. Thank you in advance for your help. *************************************** Kim Codere Grants Analyst Research & Sponsored Programs Michigan Technological University 1400 Townsend Drive Houghton, MI 49931-1295 Phone: (906) 487-2226 Fax: (906) 487-2245 E-mail: xxxxxx@mtu.edu ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================