Re: S2S report on grants.gov Joe Henig 15 Jun 2006 15:21 EST
BURNHAM INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH submitted 6 NIH R21 applications system-to-system via InfoEd's Proposal Development module and 1 NIH R21 application through PureEdge. INFOED PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT - The proposals submitted system-to-system via InfoEd went successfully and were accepted quickly by Grants.gov and the NIH eRA Commons with no significant errors. The few warnings (Department not matching and the Research Plan page limit reminder) were inconsequential. PURE EDGE - We experienced extreme difficulty in submitting the single R21 through PureEdge. We had to hit the Submit button at least thirty times (no exaggeration) and calls to the helpdesk were not helpful. Their suggestion was to keep trying. Late-afternoon on the deadline date, it finally went through. Definitely did not need the added stress of this on the deadline date. Don't know how those with very many PureEdge applications survived! In addition to the ease of submission utilizing a system-to-system approach, InfoEd runs smoothly on multiple platforms and prepopulates a significant portion of the application with Institutional and Personnel Profile information. Furthermore, the information input into the Proposal Development module flows through to our Proposal Tracking module and finally to our Financial System. No duplicate entry of grant information! Obviously, we highly recommend InfoEd over PureEdge. Regards, Joe x3998 _________________________________ Joseph P. Henig, MS, CRA Supervisor of Sponsored Research _________________________________ Sponsored Research Office (SRO) Contact us at: xxxxxx@burnham.org _________________________________ Burnham Institute for Medical Research 10901 North Torrey Pines Road La Jolla, CA 92037 (858) 646-3100 x3998 (858) 646-3189 fax xxxxxx@burnham.org _________________________________ "From research, the power to cure." Visit us at http://www.burnham.org. This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Hathaway Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11:45 AM To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org Subject: [RESADM-L] S2S report on grants.gov Over the past 2 weeks we have seen many navigating the NIH June 1 deadline for R21/R03 and heard about many errors, warnings, system failures, system slowdowns, etc. I assume that most of the people contributing these battle stories were using PureEdge to submit. Question: did anyone using a S2S mode of proposal prep and transmission (on-site or via service provider) encounter problems? I am not so much interested in knowing which S2S product/service you used as I am very curious about the SPECIFIC warnings and errors that you may have encountered or avoided. Thanks. Charlie Hathaway ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================