Re: S2S report on grants.gov Joe Henig 15 Jun 2006 15:21 EST

BURNHAM INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH submitted 6 NIH R21 applications
system-to-system via InfoEd's Proposal Development module and 1 NIH R21
application through PureEdge.

INFOED PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT - The proposals submitted system-to-system
via InfoEd went successfully and were accepted quickly by Grants.gov and
the NIH eRA Commons with no significant errors. The few warnings
(Department not matching and the Research Plan page limit reminder) were
inconsequential.

PURE EDGE - We experienced extreme difficulty in submitting the single
R21 through PureEdge. We had to hit the Submit button at least thirty
times (no exaggeration) and calls to the helpdesk were not helpful.
Their suggestion was to keep trying. Late-afternoon on the deadline
date, it finally went through. Definitely did not need the added stress
of this on the deadline date. Don't know how those with very many
PureEdge applications survived!

In addition to the ease of submission utilizing a system-to-system
approach, InfoEd runs smoothly on multiple platforms and prepopulates a
significant portion of the application with Institutional and Personnel
Profile information. Furthermore, the information input into the
Proposal Development module flows through to our Proposal Tracking
module and finally to our Financial System. No duplicate entry of grant
information!

Obviously, we highly recommend InfoEd over PureEdge.

Regards,
Joe x3998

_________________________________
Joseph P. Henig, MS, CRA
Supervisor of Sponsored Research
_________________________________
Sponsored Research Office (SRO)
Contact us at:  xxxxxx@burnham.org
_________________________________

Burnham Institute for Medical Research
10901 North Torrey Pines Road
La Jolla, CA 92037

(858) 646-3100 x3998
(858) 646-3189 fax
xxxxxx@burnham.org
_________________________________
"From research, the power to cure."
Visit us at http://www.burnham.org.

This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
destroy all copies of the original message.

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@hrinet.org] On
Behalf Of Charlie Hathaway
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 11:45 AM
To: xxxxxx@hrinet.org
Subject: [RESADM-L] S2S report on grants.gov

Over the past 2 weeks we have seen many navigating the NIH June 1
deadline for R21/R03 and heard about many errors, warnings, system
failures, system slowdowns, etc.  I assume that most of the people
contributing these battle stories were using PureEdge to submit.

Question: did anyone using a S2S mode of proposal prep and transmission
(on-site or via service provider) encounter problems?  I am not so much
interested in knowing which S2S product/service you used as I am very
curious about the SPECIFIC warnings and errors that you may have
encountered or avoided.

Thanks.

Charlie Hathaway

======================================================================
Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via
our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================