We leave out the FWA part and use just the number. We have had no errors
or warnings associated with this field - yet!

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG] On
Behalf Of Charlie Hathaway
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 11:06 AM
To: xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG
Subject: [RESADM-L] Human subjects e-applications to NIH

Help.

What format should be used for the human subject assurance number (Item
1a, Research and Related Other Project Information) in PureEdge for an
NIH proposal?

We have discovered conflicting guidelines concerning inclusion or
exclusion of the FWA prefix.

When we left it out we got a warning.

When we left it blank (by accident) there were no errors or warnings
(??!!  so helpful)

Am about to keep the FWA but would like comments

thanks

Charlie Hathaway

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================