Re: FW: NYTimes.com: For Science's Gatekeepers, a Credibility Gap
Mitchell Maltenfort 02 May 2006 08:46 EST
And another article of potential interest:
http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23352/
"BioMedCentral faces angry editors
Open access publisher says complaints are part of growing pains"
On 5/2/06, Davis, Scott (HSC) <xxxxxx@ouhsc.edu> wrote:
>
> Good Morning Group,
>
> Article of interest.
>
>
>
> HEALTH | May 2, 2006
> The Doctor's World: For Science's Gatekeepers, a Credibility Gap
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/02/health/02docs.html?ex=1147233600&en=1
> 95946816f2e2158&ei=5070&emc=eta1>
> By LAWRENCE K. ALTMAN, M.D.
> Recent disclosures of fraudulent or flawed studies in medical and
> scientific journals have again called into question the merits of their
> peer-review system.
>
> Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Scott
>
> Scott Davis, CRA
> Sponsored Programs Administrator
> University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
>
> Tel: 405-271-2090
> Fax: 405-271-8651
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
> via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
> ======================================================================
>
--
I can answer any question.
"I don't know" is an answer.
"I don't know yet" is a better answer.
======================================================================
Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================