Re: NIH eRA rumors Anna Dore 04 Apr 2006 08:13 EST
I also attended the NIH regional seminar and gathered that the verification step will be eliminated and replaced with an institutional assurance that the PI has signed off on the application. It's also my understanding that the AOR/SO, not the PI, can reject the application within two days. As Liz said, watch for the NIH Guide! Here's an announcement from COGR regarding the institutional assurance: From: COGR [mailto:xxxxxx@usc.edu] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 12:45 PM To: xxxxxx@usc.edu Subject: COGR: NIH To Eliminate PI Signature Requirement We have learned that NIH will announce a change in the Grants.gov/ NIH Commons submission process in the NIH Guide this week (April 7). The need to provide a PI (or PIs) signature on applications and formal correspondence will be eliminated. The institution will be required to maintain and present upon request a written certification or assurance with a unique signature and date from the PI that supports the submission of the specific application. As we understand the change, the certification or assurance must meet the requirements that the investigators' signature currently met: 1) that the information submitted within the application is true, complete and accurate to the best of the PI's knowledge; 2) that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject the PI to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties; and 3) that the PI agrees to accept responsibility for the scientific conduct of the project and to provide the required progress reports if a grant is awarded as a result of the application. The NIH Guide is formally published on Fridays with items added to the Guide throughout the week. The Guide is available on NIH's web site at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/WeeklyIndex.cfm Carol Blum Director Research Compliance & Administration Council on Government Relations 1200 New York Ave., NW Suite 750 Washington DC 20005 202-289-6655, ext. 17 FAX: 202-289-6698 xxxxxx@cogr.edu -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG] On Behalf Of Elizabeth C. Lieberman Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 8:06 AM To: xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] NIH eRA rumors We learned about this change at the NIH Regional Seminar in Boston last week. It will be officially announced in this week's NIH Guide. Liz ******************************** Research Administration Discussion List <xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG> on Monday, April 03, 2006 at 11:37 PM -0500 wrote: >I've been told that NIH will issue new guidelines saying that the >mandatory verification step at the eRA commons will no longer be >necessary. Instead, the PI will be responsible for checking that the >application is OK within two days. If changes need to be made the PI >will hit "Reject" and will have the opportunity to change it. If not >eRA commons will send grant (automatically?) to review. > >Can anyone confirm? ------------------------------------------------------- Liz Lieberman Director, Office of Sponsored Research Assistant Dean of the College Wellesley College 106 Central Street Wellesley, MA 02481-8203 Phone: (781) 283-3587; Fax: (781) 283-3695 E-mail: xxxxxx@wellesley.edu ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================