Re: Question about GrantSlam? wschumi 12 Dec 2005 17:31 EST

This doesn't all apply to us since he is talking about GrantSLam, but
thought it would be interesting info for our project - see paragraph
about S2S - and no institution being ready by 2nd quarter 06.  - We'll
almost be there!!!!

Win Ann

Robert Beattie wrote:
> I am now in for some loose change too.
>
> 1.  First, perhaps there are some misconceptions about GrantSlam.  This
> system was initially developed to allow PI/staff to produce  paper
> copies of the NIH 398 and other NIH applications.  It was a  single user
> program and so was marketed directly to potential users.   The users
> entered data into the system which then created a very nice  printed 398
> application for routing and approval within the  university and sending
> to NIH.  Thus there are many users of this  version around the country
>
> 2.  In view of its success in the paper mode, Cayuse Software was
> selected as one of 6 vendors to develop an electronic delivery system
> for applications to NIH as part of the electronic Competing Grants
> Application Process (eCGAP).  We at Michigan wanted to participate in
> this project so applied for a sub contract from Cayuse to test the
> system by making submissions.  Note that as part of its grant from  NIH,
> the company was to solicit testers for the system.  To this end,  using
> NIH lists of grantees, they did send messages asking for people  to test
> the system.  Testers would need to involve their grants  office.  We
> obtained a sub contract and submitted about a dozen  applications.
>
> 3.  As part of the eCGAP development, the company was moving from a
> client-server system to an open source fully web-based version that
> would be much more flexible and might better meet the central
> management needs of an institution.  Then the eCGAP project was  halted
> and the NIH vendors were directed to work on solutions that  linked to
> Grants.gov and used the Form 424(R&R) wrapped around a Form  398.  This
> system would be grants office based and so direct  solicitation of
> faculty would not be useful.  I suspect those who had  successful
> experiences with the paper GrantSlam program wanted to  carry that over
> to the electronic side of things.
>
> 4. Cayuse is now working on this new system to allow users to create
> applications compatible with Grants.gov.  The system is still being
> built so I have not used it.  I do know that the plan is to allow  users
> to open a file with the appropriate schema for the desired  application
> downloaded from Grants.gov.  This can be done with mac or  pc.  Saved
> data such as institutional information, PI profiles, and  budgets can be
> incorporated into the file.  Unique information can be  added and text
> files converted to pdf and up-loaded. I have just   completed the
> conversion of a Grants.gov file to an NIH Commons  version (helped a PI
> with an STTR) and can say there is much tedious  data entry and
> opportunities for errors.  I refer to NIH fatal errors  that are not
> revealed until the file reaches the NIH Commons.  These  must be
> corrected prior to the final deadline.
>
> The complete file can then be printed if desired (not so with plain
> Grants.gov file except section by section), or viewed, and approved
> electronically by the appropriate officials and then submitted to
> Grants.gov via an html stream ala the S2S procedure.  This process
> would be instead of requiring users to treat each application as a
> unique task and route as a paper copy for approval to the grants  office
> which would then submit as is done now.  I hope to know more  about this
> system and get a chance to test it.
>
> I know some grants office folks are nervous about waiting for  something
> that will not be ready until perhaps the early second  quarter of 2006.
> I doubt any school will have created its own system  by then.  One
> advantage I think that comes from such a system is that  it would work
> for all sponsors who use Grants.gov.  I certainly  cannot vouch for it
> now but do look forward to testing it. Grants.gov  staff are very
> sensitive to the Mac problem and hope to have it  corrected soon. Even
> if there is no platform problem, a G.g interface  option might be
> useful.   In the past I have made objective  appraisals of the eCGAP
> system and will continue to do so for the  Grants.govSlam product.  So
> more later, I hope.
>
> Bob
> xxxxxx@umich.edu
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2005, at 2:42 PM, Jon Hart wrote:
>
>  I had to add my 2 cents on this.
> About 50% of our faculty use MACs, and the PureEdge solution has them
> ready
> to take the grants.gov offices by storm (und drang).  For this reason
> (only)
> we are going to have to have a solution apart from the PureEdge  software,
> which offers a MAC "fix" that is basically unworkable.  We purchased
> InfoEd's Proposal Development module some time ago (we use other
> modules of
> theirs) which is a web-based solution that will accept any platform
> that can
> mount a browser, which we hope will work for everyone until  grants.gov
> gets
> their act in order -- if they ever do.  Grants.gov has forced those  of us
> with substantial MAC communities to purchase third-party software,  whether
> InfoEd, GrantSlam (historically a good product, in my opinion), or other
> vendors' programs.  I think it unconscionable that our government has
> put us
> in this position to request federal assistance for important  research, but
> there you are (vent).
>
> Joni.
>
>
> Jon Hart, M.P.A., C.I.P.
> Senior Director
> Office of Sponsored Programs Administration
> Human Subjects Protections Program
> The Rockefeller University
> email:  xxxxxx@mail.rockefeller.edu
> Tel:  (212) 327-8054; fax:  (212) 327-8400
>
>
>
> ======================================================================
>  Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>  subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
>  via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
> ======================================================================
>
>
> ======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
> via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
> ======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================