I would be intereted in this infomation also.

Susan W. Meslang
Director of Grants and Sponsored  Programs
Tidewater Community College
500 East Main Street
Norfolk VA 23510
P.O. Box 9000
Norfolk VA 23509
Office 757 822-1773
Cell 757 409-2887
Fax 757 822-1007
xxxxxx@tcc.edu

>>> xxxxxx@ND.EDU 08/27/05 8:23 AM >>>
Whoa, Charlie...guess I need to clarify.
NOT suggesting we 'outlaw' using "Statistician" or "Data Analyst"
to describe roles in research projects. These descriptions can be
immensely helpful in the narrative and budget but are way too
specific for what I was seeking.  I'm going for overall big-picture
roles
whether stated within proposal or not...so that everyone is clear on
who can spend and who can't more or less.

I was looking for a list (if there is one) that provided general
descriptions
of possible roles...and the list would  be something like this:
PI - directs project, responsible for overall outcome, main fiscal
responsibility, from our institution only
Co-PI - specific duties on project, may have fiscal responsibility if
allowed by
PI re:
 record-keeping, and may have some spending ability, from our
institution
only
Senior/Other Personnel - duties on project, no fiscal responsibility
and cannot
spend
 without permisison of PI (or Co-PI when allowed), can be from
other
institutions or organizations/industry
Grad student - directed by others on project, some duties, no spending
ability,
from our institution only
Collaborator: develops and spends own budget, works with PI to
determine duties
in joint effort, receives own award, can be from other institutions or
organizations/industry
Subcontract/Subawardeee: develops statement of work with PI, creates
own budget
but is paid by PI institution for work - is part of PI's award - can
spend only
amount provided by PI from sponsor, can be from other institutions or
organizations/industry
etc.

These descriptions are just off the top of my head and certainly
unofficial, but
I hope it clarifies things.

The Statistician or Data Analyst would fall in the Senior/Other
Personnel
category most likely...which could tell everyone he/she has no spending
ability
on this project .. and again SHOULD be listed as Statistician, etc on
proposal.

Does that make more sense?  This stems from a PI request to include
someone from
another institution on a proposal, but this 'someone' didn't want to
have to run
it through his institution. The question was...if he's not a subaward,
what role
can he play to achieve that?  This original question got us thinking
then about
the new initiative to list multiple PI's and what that will do to
monitoring
expenditures on the projects.

Thanks to all for previous responses...and I welcome more in this
discussion.
Terri

--
Terri Hall
Associate Director of Sponsored Programs (eRA)
Office of Research*University of Notre Dame
Phn: (574) 631-7378*Fax: (574) 631-6630
511 Main Building*Notre Dame, IN*46556

Quoting xxxxxx@aecom.yu.edu:

> You know, I come from the research side of the mountain where it is
felt that
> competitiveness in seeking extramural funding should be the goal of
research
> administration. It is also generally conceded that there are "rules"
that you
> have to obey so someone doesn't go to jail.
>
> But if some "data dictionary" is going to tell me that on my proposal
I can't
> label Dr. X as a "Statistician" or "Data Analyst" or "Translator"
(which are
> certainly much more useful and descriptive of roles than are "Grad
Student"
> or "Other" ??!!), then I am going to burn that data dictionary.
Cmon, are
> you
> really going to sacrifice clarity for strict adherence to some list
of
> titles?
>
> CH
>
> Quoting Joseph Bass <xxxxxx@jsb-consulting.com>:
>
> > These are the project roles that were in the original data
dictionary
> > Consultant
> > Co-PD/PI
> > Graduate Student
> > Key Person
> > Other
> > Other Professional
> > PD/PI
> > Post Doctoral
> > Post Doctoral Associate
> > Technician
> > Undergraduate Student
> >
> > I have attached a old Key Person page
> >
> >
> > Joe Bass
> > JSB Consulting, LLC
> > Managing Member
> > xxxxxx@JSB-Consulting.com
> >
> > Phone: 301-774-4229 Mobile: 240-305-8056 Fax: 240-220-0654
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xxxxxx@aecom.yu.edu [mailto:xxxxxx@aecom.yu.edu]
> > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 6:15 PM
> > To: xxxxxx@jsb-consulting.com
> > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Roles on research projects
> >
> > I'd be interested.  I just can't imagine tho.  To have some
bureaucrat
> > question whether a technician is doing technician stuff rather
than
> > investigator or
> > administrative4 assistant stuff seems ridiculous.  And...my
comments were
> > based on memories of people creating very unconventional sounding
roles on
> > NIH proposals, mostly in social sciences.  But i might be wrong.
> >
> > charlie
> >
> > Quoting xxxxxx@jsb-consulting.com:
> >
> > > I think roles and definitions exist. Maybe not in Grants.Gov but
the
> > > standard has them. I can send it to you if you want
> > >
> > > Joe Bass
> > > xxxxxx@jsb-consulting.com
> > >
> > > --- Original Message ---
> > > From: Charlie Hathaway <xxxxxx@AECOM.YU.EDU>
> > > Sent: Fri 8/26/2005 3:27 pm
> > > To: xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG
> > > Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Roles on research projects
> > >
> > > I don't think there is a list of acceptable roles.  Other than
PI, I
> > > doubt the feds would attempt definitions.  Definitions would
limit the
> > > ability of researchers to do what they think needs to be done.
Who's
> > > to say there could
> > >
> > > never be a "Snake Charmer" or "Massage Therapist" on a grant?
> > >
> > > As for Co-PIs (a meaningless term at present)...I'll bet the new
> > > policy uses
> > >
> > > equal lead investigators at different institutions as a
proto-typical
> > > example
> > >
> > > of why true Co-PIs are needed.
> > >
> > > CH
> > >
> > >
> > > Quoting Terri Hall <xxxxxx@ND.EDU>:
> > >
> > > > We have had several discussions about the various roles on
research
> > > projects,
> > > > their definitions, and their responsibilities or spending
privileges
> > > > on
> > > the
> > > > projects.
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone know if these roles have been defined by the
federal
> > > government
> > > > for federal projects? Or is this up to the discretion of the
sponsor
> > > > or university as to who can serve as what, and the
duties/privileges
> > > > each
> > > role
> > > > will have?
> > > >
> > > > For example...if one of our investigators wants to include an
> > > > investigator from another institution on a proposal...that
investigator
> > can serve as a:
> > > > 1. subcontractor/subawardee
> > > > 2. collaborator
> > > > 3. consultant
> > > > 4. senior personnel/key personnel/other significant contributor
5. ?
> > > > other options?
> > > >
> > > > Secondly, we do not currently allow those from other
institutions to
> > > > serve
> > > as
> > > > co-PIs on our projects unless it is a sponsor requirement. But
now
> > > > there's talk of multiple-PI's on projects...yikes!
> > > >
> > > > Anyone know of a complete list of research personnel allowed
on
> > > > federal projects? with definitions of roles and who has
spending
> > authority or not?
> > > >
> > > > I couldn't find anything in the RESADM-L archives...or
NCURA...or
> > > > SRA regarding this.
> > > > Some university websites provide definitions..but none
references a
> > > federal
> > > > source.
> > > > Are there any?
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Terri
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Terri M. Hall
> > > > Associate Director of Sponsored Programs (eRA) Office of
Research *
> > > > University of Notre Dame
> > > > 511 Main Building * Notre Dame, Indiana 46556
> > > > Phn: (574) 631-7378  Fax: (574) 631-6630
> > > > http://www.nd.edu/~research/ ~ an FDP institution ~
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
====================================================================
> > > > ==  Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List,
including
> > > > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are
available
> > > > via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv
> > > > Lists")
> > > >
====================================================================
> > > > ==
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
======================================================================
> > >  Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> > > subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are
available
> > > via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv
Lists")
> > >
======================================================================
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================