Re: NSF Conference or Visit Susan Meslang 22 Jul 2004 13:20 EST
YOu stated this so well. I wish some upper administrators could read your explanation. Susan W. Meslang Director of Grants and Sponsored Programs Tidewater Community College 121 College Place Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1907 Office 757 822-1773 Cell 757 409-2887 Fax 757 822-1007 xxxxxx@tcc.edu >>> xxxxxx@MMC.EDU 7/22/2004 1:33:17 PM >>> There seem to be two camps on this matter, each of which regards the other as naive. One camp, which usually includes sponsored programs officers and successful scholars, believes that grants are awarded on the basis of peer review. Peer reviewers look at documents--words, figures, and numbers on paper ot a screen--and so the key to better applications is to get better at putting words, figures, and numbers on paper or a screen. Conferences like the ones you speak of present a systematic way of doing that by covering, ususally, the tasks that reviewers are asked to perform--information that PIs can use to present their arguments in ways that are easier for reviewers to follow and therefore, often more convincing. People in this camp (and I am one) think it's naive to believe you can improve your success rate by chatting up program officers, because the peer review process minimizes their influence over funding decisions; at some level we also think that's the way things should be. The other camp thinks it's naive to believe that personal relationships don't play a role in funding decsisions. Peer review and the application document have a role in funding decisions, yes, but it never hurts to market yourself or your institution to agency officials, especially in person. Persons in this camp are often fairly senior administrators and as it happens they have strong oral persuasive skills They need these skills to do their jobs well, properly take pride in their skill at deal-making, and believe that grant-making can be influenced by these skills, exercised by themselves or by PIs. If you have to choose between the two approaches, I would pick the first one, but it's hard to convince people in the second camp that the first one is valid. What is important is to remind faculty members of the mantra that one member of this listserv puts on each transmission: When all is said and done, the best way to get a grant is to write an application. -----Original Message----- From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG]On Behalf Of Deborah Hofer Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 11:42 AM To: xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG Subject: [RESADM-L] NSF Conference or Visit Friends, I ask your perspective on a strategy to encourage proposal writing and enhance award success rates. NSF is hosting a regional grants conference at Washington University to which I would like to send some of our faculty. According to the announcement: "Key representatives from the National Science Foundation as well as your colleagues - faculty, researchers and grant administrators - representing regional colleges and universities will participate." http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/outreach.htm <http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/outreach.htmOur> Our Dean of Science is advocating instead, sending a team from our institution directly to NSF to meet one on one with program officers, contending that it would establish personal relationships and not allow us to get 'lost in the crowd' of a conference setting. Which effort would you support? P.S. I want to go myself but have to decide between this and the NCURA meeting in DC. Help? Many thanks. Deborah Deborah d'Este Hofer MM Grants/Human Subjects Administrator Vice President's Office for Academic Affairs Southern Oregon University 541.552.8662 xxxxxx@sou.edu ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================