While I agree that, if the note is not intended for the entire list, it is
good to reply only to the sender...  BUT...  I would hate to see the list
not accomodate "replies" at all -- there are many instances when it is very
legitimate for the reply to go to the list-- that is why I thought they
called them "discussion" lists...

Patty Siebenmorgen

At 12:55 PM 5/13/2004 -0400, you wrote:
>Folks,
>At the risk of being impertinent, I implore you NOT to "reply" to messages
>like Chuck's because the "reply" goes to the entire list. Instead, you can
>send the person a "private" note by copying the sender's address from the
>header information and pasting it into a new e-mail message.
>
>As an aside, I wonder if the list owners can set up the list so that
>replies go only to the original sender and not the list; and those who
>want to send to the entire list would then need to begin a new message.
>
>thanks, Elsa
>
>
>
>Elsa G. Nadler
>Grants Manager
>Department of Community Medicine
>1 Medical Center Drive
>PO Box 9190
>West Virginia University
>Morgantown, WV 26506-9190
>
>Tel: 304/293-3546
>Fax: 304/293-6685
>
>======================================================================
>Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
>subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via
>our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
>======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================