Re: Assessment of Services and Funded Projects Dolce, Peter J 09 Dec 2003 16:07 EST
Most sponsors require a report at the end of the project and often at more frequent intervals, e.g., yearly. If these reports flow through the sponsored programs office--if a sponsored programs, officer must sign or approve them, and keep a copy--they constitute a written record of what has been accomplished. The sponsored programs office, however, or any central adminsitrative office, usually isn't in a good position and/or doesn't have time to determine the accuracy of these reports. I think this task is best entrusted to departments and department chairs--to scholars and scientists with training appropriate to evaluate the project and who are close to the work. The successes and failures of projects then get reflected in annual reports and similar documents that chairs submit to their bosses. You have to trust the faculty and trust academic departments in this matter. There are a few things that a central admin office can count to judge the success of a program, like publications; did the PI succeed in renewing the grant or getting another award? And did the PI spend all the money that was awarded (large unspent balances may indicate a program is in trouble, but this by itself is an unreliable indicator). As for assessing the quality of our services--many years ago our office surveyed the faculty about our services and got lots of valuable info--strengths we didn't know we had, flaws we did and didn't recognize. Since then it's one of thing thing I mean to do each year, but never do. I'm sure more conscientious offices do it every year. -----Original Message----- From: Susan Stumpp [mailto:xxxxxx@CAPITAL.EDU] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 2:32 PM To: xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG Subject: [RESADM-L] Assessment of Services and Funded Projects Capital University is engaged in a campus wide assessment initiative. Do other grants/sponsored project offices have plans to assess the quality of their services and/or the impact of the projects that are funded? By impact I mean: do the finished projects accomplish what was stated in a proposal? How do you know? If academic administration deals with those issues, does the grants/sponsored project office ever learn about the assessment via an established procedure, not by hearsay? Thanks!! -- Susan Stumpp Faculty Grants Director Capital University 2199 E. Main Street 100 Ruff Learning Center Columbus, Ohio 43209 614.236.6572 614.236.6916 FAX ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ====================================================================== This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. It is intended only for the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this e-mail or the information contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please delete it and immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail. Thank you. ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================