Kim;

We use option 2. which tries to make them more conscious of our equipment
definitions.  PS we do not formally rebudget and the financial system
automatically continues to charge F&A beyond the F&A budgeted amount.

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Moreland, Kim [mailto:xxxxxx@FHCRC.ORG]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 2:41 PM
To: xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG
Subject: [RESADM-L] Really Quick IDC Question!

 I would really appreciate your response to the question below.  At
the Hutchinson Center, we currently follow option #1, but we're looking at
making a change.  Thanks very much!

 What does your institution do when a PI reallocates budget funds
from a category like equipment, which is excluded from indirect costs, into
a category like supplies, on which indirect costs are earned?
 (1) Leave the total direct costs at the level awarded, even
though you would not be able to recover the full indirect costs earned?  OR
 (2) Move the associated indirect costs in relation to the
direct costs, thus moving within the total costs awarded (rather than just
within total directs?

 Kim

 Kim Moreland, Director
 Grant and Contract Administration
 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
 1100 Fairview Avenue, N
 M/S J6-500
 Seattle, Washington  98109
 xxxxxx@fhcrc.org
 206/667-4868 (voice)
 206/667-6221 (fax)

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================