Just for the record, Amy's message received a "SpamAssassin" score of -4.7 from my machine.  I'm not sure what that means, but it is the lowest number I've seen.  And I think low is good.  An ad from Oracle, with lots of frills got a +3.3.  And...the other RESADM message(s) that Amy referred to were above +1.

All we need now is a program that quantifies the value of reading an email.  Or a grant?

Charlie

At 12:24 PM 6/25/03 -0700, you wrote:
>Hello all-
>I hate to be so grouchy, but I'd like to point out that emailing messages
>with a background is pretty, but it makes the message exponentially larger
>than it needs to be.  Worse, when someone replies to your message, it seems
>to carry the background with it, making each subsequent response larger and
>larger.
>For those of us with limits on email storage, this can be a problem.
>
>Thanks,
>-Amy
>
>Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what
>no one else has thought.
>-Albert von Nagyrapolt
>
>Amy Hibbard
>Grants Administrator
>Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences
>535 Watson Drive, Claremont, CA 91711
>T: (909) 607-9313 / 607-7855
>F: (909) 607-8086
>xxxxxx@kgi.edu
>www.kgi.edu
>
>
>======================================================================
> Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
> subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
> via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
>======================================================================
>
>

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================