Email list hosting service & mailing list manager


Re: Incremental Workload Accretion Mary Watson 14 Apr 2003 09:51 EST

Chuck

I don't have hard data - just the infamous 'sense of the truth of your
observations" and I would be most interested in obtaining data.  In
fact, I would love to work with someone on developing a serious
research project around this question of incremental additional
duties - most of them, it appears coming from external sources but all
of them landing in our proverbial laps.

Mary H. Watson
VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY

-----Original Message-----
From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG]On
Behalf Of Herbert B. Chermside
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2003 8:30 AM
To: xxxxxx@HRINET.ORG
Subject: [RESADM-L] Incremental Workload Accretion

My office has observed in the last couple of years a large increase of
little things to do thrust upon us.  Just-in-time proposal data.
Letters
of approval.  Reports of compliance measures.  Little things that take
just
2 - 5 minutes -- of each of three people's time; receptionist,
research
administrator, signing authority.  Just little things -- many times a
day.  It adds up to a significant increase in the office work load per
major transaction.

For example, we used to review a proposal, sign everything, and then
not
see it until the award came.  Now we review the proposal; we spend
extra
time with it because it has to be submitted electronically (by a
different
method for each sponsor); we receive requests for JIT information; we
forward that to the PI to collect the data; we receive it back from
the PI;
we sign/certify, etc.; we fax it back to the sponsor; and finally an
award
comes.

Are other sponsored program offices experiencing the same increase in
required administrative activity required by the sponsors?  Has anyone
measured it?  Do you have anecdotal reports?

If you have some data, please respond on the list or privately.
Identify
"hard" data and "experienced observation" separately, please.
Experienced
observation is very useful, but we must separate the two.  If you can
identify a specific cause for some of it, please do.  (For example,
106-107
is forcing all these different electronic proposal mechanisms -- it's
not
electronic that really gets to us, but that they are all different!)
I'll
compile responses in about a week and share.

Chuck
Herbert B. Chermside, CRA
Director, Sponsored Programs Administration
Virginia Commonwealth University
PO BOX 980568
Richmond, VA  23298-0568
Express Delivery Only:
 Biotech One, Suite 113
 Virginia Biotechnology Research Park
 800 East Leigh Street
 Richmond, VA 23219
Voice:  804-828-6772
Fax     804-828-2521
OFFICE e-mail   xxxxxx@VCU.EDU
Personal e-mail xxxxxx@vcu.edu
http://www.research.vcu.edu/ospa.htm

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================