Thanks to all of you who replied to my question on the composition or
membership of internal research committees.

As a clarification to those who inquired ... the question is aimed
primarily at non R-1 schools.

We are in the process of reviewing the structure of our internal research
committee.  The committee reviews internal proposals from all the academic
areas of the University for funding research and creative activity.  It
rates the proposals and then makes recommendations for funding.  Funding is
distributed and administered from our office.

Over the years we have seen a number of models for membership on these
types of committees.  For example, some schools use two representatives
from each college and an "at large appointment."  Others use
representatives from various "areas" (humanities, biological sciences,
pedagogy, etc.).

We would appreciate input from those of you who have these committees on
how you determine your membership.

Bud May
Director

======================================================================
 Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including
 subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available
 via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists")
======================================================================