USDA lawsuit tentative settlement Renner, Michael 04 Oct 2000 08:50 EST
This might be of interest to the list: ===================== Chronicle of Higher Education Lobbyists Say Research Will Suffer From Reported Settlement of Animal-Rights Lawsuit By RON SOUTHWICK Washington To the dismay of biomedical researchers, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has tentatively agreed to settle a lawsuit seeking to increase the protection of birds, mice, and rats used in research. The settlement could cost universities millions of dollars in additional paperwork and appears to greatly expand federal regulations, research advocates say. The Alternatives Research and Development Foundation, based in Minnesota, filed the suit to obtain protection for birds, mice, and rats under the Animal Welfare Act. The law is designed to protect warm-blooded animals in laboratories and zoos, but enforcement has been currently restricted to larger mammals, such as cats, dogs, and monkeys. Both the government and the foundation, which promotes alternatives to using animals in laboratory studies, acknowledge that they have agreed to a settlement. However, neither side would discuss its terms until the judge handling the case, U.S. District Court Judge Ellen S. Huvelle, approves the pact. While details of the settlement are still unknown, research lobbying groups expressed their disappointment Monday. University lobbyists argued that expanding the regulations would be very expensive and could even slow medical advances. "Settling this suit without taking into account the deep concerns of the research community is a serious mistake," said Jordan J. Cohen, president of the Association of American Medical Colleges. The National Association for Biomedical Research, which represents 350 universities and companies, led a last-minute pitch to the Agriculture Department to drop settlement negotiations late last month. About 800 institutional representatives sent letters or e-mail messages to the Agriculture Department opposing any negotiations. "There is broad concern about this," said Barbara A. Rich, the association's executive vice president. Fearing that the settlement would make animal research much more expensive, the Johns Hopkins University asked the federal court for permission to intervene in the case. So far, the university hasn't heard if it will be allowed to join the lawsuit, said Dennis O'Shea, a university spokesman. The Agriculture Department had argued that the agency lacked the money and staff to expand its enforcement. Department officials said that widening the law's scope would actually weaken the department's other animal-protection efforts. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael J. Renner, Ph.D. Interim Associate Vice President Office of Faculty Development, Scholarship & Research Professor of Psychology West Chester University West Chester, PA 19383 xxxxxx@wcupa.edu Telephone: 610-436-3310 Fax: 610-436-2763 http://www.wcupa.edu/_facstaff/facdev/ "The path of least resistance is always downhill." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ====================================================================== Instructions on how to use the RESADM-L Mailing List, including subscription information and a web-searchable archive, are available via our web site at http://www.hrinet.org (click on "Listserv Lists") ======================================================================