Thank you, Sandra.

I will confer as it may be indeed all funds are spent, certainly there is no more effort. There is the faculty perception that they would look better to show a history of awards but I would wonder if the award as NCE would be considered a synergistic activity for the biosketch.

Within the project description the results from prior support are disclosed. Of course, the NCE means the award is not prior.

Gina Betcher, MFA, CPRA

W-Hub Harriot College of Arts & Sciences

2300 Bate Building

Greenville NC 27858-4353

TEL: 252-737-4389

EM: xxxxxx@ecu.edu

From: Research Administration List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> On Behalf Of Sears, Heather
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 10:09 AM
To: xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Meeting the new NSF C&P Requirement

This email originated from outside ECU.

Hi Gina,

On the one I did, I only entered effort for CY 2020 and beyond, not past years. Whether that was right or not I can’t say, but given that NSF uses these to determine whether the investigator has time to work on a new project, I didn’t figure the past years were relevant. I never know what to do with NCEs, and this is even more confounding with having to list the effort for each year. Maybe just an estimate of the actual effort the PI anticipates putting on the award, whether paid or not? If awards are in NCE but the project is complete, funds fully spent, and we’re just waiting for the end date to arrive, I usually leave them off the C&P.

Heather

Heather Sears, PhD

Contracts & Grants Manager

UCSD Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Urey Hall Addition 2050

858-534-3574

From: Research Administration List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> on behalf of "Betcher, Gina" <xxxxxx@ECU.EDU>
Reply-To: Research Administration Discussion List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG>
Date: Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 6:59 AM
To: "xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG" <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG>
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Meeting the new NSF C&P Requirement

Hi all,

I am in the middle of warming a collaborative team to using the new C&P. My concern now is that one current award is on a no cost extension and with five CM effort years available, I should say with only five CM effort years available, I am unsure what to report. We’re into YR 7

From: Research Administration List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> On Behalf Of Sears, Heather
Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 9:28 AM
To: xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG
Subject: Re: [RESADM-L] Meeting the new NSF C&P Requirement

This email originated from outside ECU.

Hi Andrew,

In our department, delegates will be creating/maintaining C&Ps. This is in alignment with our previous practice. I created the initial file for one of my faculty recently, and it was quite painful, but I think updating it after this won’t be too bad. He had 7 current and 5 pending and in total the initial setup took me about an hour, maybe a little more. I can’t imagine our faculty doing this themselves—they’d be pulling their hair out. An ORCID import function would be nice, but I don’t think that would have the effort per year information that is required (right?), so that would still be a manual input.

As painful as this was, I’d imagine that using the PDF form would be infinitely worse. At least with this, deleting an entry is just one click and the formatting resets itself.

Heather

Heather Sears, PhD

Contracts & Grants Manager

UCSD Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry

Urey Hall Addition 2050

858-534-3574

From: Research Administration List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG> on behalf of Andrew Kline <xxxxxx@LEHIGH.EDU>
Reply-To: Research Administration Discussion List <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG>
Date: Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 5:17 AM
To: "xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG" <xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG>
Subject: [RESADM-L] Meeting the new NSF C&P Requirement

Dear pre- and post-award gurus,

Does anyone have insights / lessons learned regarding meeting the new NSF Current and Pending requirements? We were hoping that a data import would be possible (ideally from ORCID, which our University has recently widely implemented), but everything I am seeing within SciENcv indicates that this will be a manual data entry assignment, and no such automated functionality is imminently planned.

1) Should we be expecting an import function in SciENcv or should we be directing faculty/delegates to manually enter data in SciENcv and forgo the external source input (e.g. ORCID)? Are we missing something in this regard? (Please, someone tell me some good news!)

2) Is your school relying on delegates to enter the data?

3) Are your faculty resistant to completing this requirement if they need to complete it themselves? (Given that the new requirement effectively un-automates our C&P process, I am concerned that we may have some unhappy faculty members).

Your thoughts are much appreciated! Please feel free to respond to me directly.

Best regards,

Andrew

Andrew H. Kline, CRA

Senior Contract and Grant Specialist

Office of Research and Sponsored Programs

Lehigh University

610-758-6832

To unsubscribe from the RESADM-L list, click the following link:
http://lists.healthresearch.org/scripts/wa-HLTHRES.exe?SUBED1=RESADM-L&A=1