Dear Faculty and Staff,
Pursuant to the email communications that the GCO sent on 4/4/19 entitled “NIH - Foreign Influences on Research Integrity,” we are following up and providing more specific information on disclosing foreign affiliations and best practices.
Before we go into those details, we thought we’d share with you a timely article from Science Magazine on the NIH and foreign influences on research integrity.
Why are the NIH and the FBI so concerned?
During a hearing of a Senate panel that oversees the NIH budget, Senator Roy Blunt (R–MO), asked NIH Director Frances Collins “..about NIH’s ongoing efforts to ensure that grantees are complying with agency rules on disclosing foreign ties, protecting the confidentiality of peer review, and handling intellectual property. ‘Something that the research community needs to take more seriously,’ Blunt said in his opening remarks, is ‘that foreign governments are initiating systematic ways to influence our research and frankly to take advantage of our research by stealing it.’ Blunt mentioned China in particular, which he said has a ‘government program to recruit NIH-funded researchers’ to set up shadow labs in China and steal U.S. intellectual property and confidential grant information. ‘I think NIH has to be sure that the research community is fully aware of the threats and more importantly, how to combat those threats,’ Blunt said.” Click here for the full Science Magazine article.
This communications focuses on the NIH definition of foreign involvement and how to report foreign involvement on your NIH grant application and after your grant is underway It does not replace the NIH application instructions so be sure to read those when completing.
“If I don’t pay for it, does it actually happen?” What is Foreign Involvement?
A common misconception is that foreign involvement only occurs when there is a subaward to a foreign institution. The actual definition (in section 1.2) from the NIH Grants Policy Statement (NIHGPS) is much broader:
The performance of any significant scientific element or segment of a project outside of the United States, either by the recipient or by a researcher employed by a foreign organization, whether or not grant funds are expended. Activities that would meet this definition include, but are not limited to,
(1) the involvement of human subjects or animals,
(2) extensive foreign travel by recipient project staff for the purpose of data collection, surveying, sampling, and similar activities, or
(3) any activity of the recipient that may have an impact on U.S. foreign policy through involvement in the affairs or environment of a foreign country.
Examples of other grant-related activities that may be significant are:
How do I report foreign involvement to the NIH?
There are 3 ways to do.
Whenever there is Foreign Involvement as defined above, question 6 in the Other Project Information Page must be answered “yes.”
Depending on the type of foreign involvement, there are numerous other places where this information may also be disclosed.
2. Reporting in Annual Research Performance Progress Report (RPPR)
Please see the sections below. The NIH RPPR instructions are
here.
G.9 Foreign component. Provide the organization name, country, and description of each foreign component.
Depending on the type of foreign involvement there are numerous other places where this information may also be disclosed.
C.1 – Publications
Are there publications or manuscripts accepted for publication in a journal or other publication (e.g., book, one-time publication, monograph, preprint) during the reporting period resulting directly from the award?
Is the individual’s primary affiliation with a foreign organization? Y/N
E. 4 - What dollar amount of the award’s budget is being spent in foreign country(ies)? If more than one foreign country identify the distribution between the foreign countries.
G.8 Project/Performance Sites.
If there are changes to the project/performance site(s) displayed, edit as appropriate.
3. Prior Approval Request - What if foreign involvement was not included in the competitive NIH application or a subsequent RPPR and I’m adding later on?
This prior approval request follows the standard process as explained in this GCO prior approval guidance document. The PI sends the request to the GCO and the GCO reviews and endorses it.
We plan on posting this communication series on foreign influence and disclosure to the NIH on the GCO webpage. In the meantime, if you need any former communications, please do contact me.
Sincerely, Allison Gottlieb
Allison Gottlieb, M.S. | Director, Sponsored Programs Education | Grants and Contracts Office
150 East 42nd, 10th Floor | New York, New York 10017-5629
Tel: 646.605.8678 (ISMMS Internal: Dial “68678”) | Fax: 212.241.3294 | E-Mail:
xxxxxx@mssm.edu |
Website:
http://www.icahn.mssm.edu/research/resources/grants-and-contracts-office
PLEASE DO NOT REPLY DIRECTLY TO THIS MESSAGE.
This is a broadcast email sent on behalf of the Sender and/or Department. If you wish to respond, please follow the contact instructions in the message ONLY.
You are currently subscribed as: xxxxxx@mssm.edu.
Visit the Research Portal Getting Started page
and enter this email address under Research Listserv to update your subscription preferences at any time within the MSHS firewall.