Hi Pamela,

 

Good question!

 

The Project Narrative is the ideal place to describe how the facilities / resources will be leveraged in the project. If the PI(s) are working to conserve space (15 pages of prime real estate), my advice would be to cover the institutions priorities, values, commitment in a cover letter – elaborating on how unique/novel the commitment to undergraduate research is unique/novel in your geographic region or compared to other institutions.

 

It is important to note that the NSF PAPPG guidelines caution applicants to not include information that is better placed in the Project Narrative (student success is an institutional priority) or Budget Justification (description of cost share commitment).

 

That said, you can include a leading sentence on the Facilities and Infrastructure page, such as:

“The Facilities, Equipment, and Other Resources described here demonstrate our institutional commitment to Undergraduate Research, as described in the Project Narrative.”

 

My two cents, for what it is worth.

Good luck!

 

Sandy Justice

Office of Research 

University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee

 

cid:image001.jpg@01D31C33.B2DF6110

8350 N. Tamiami Trail C114 | Sarasota, FL 34243

Office: 941-359-4618 | Mobile: 813-361-7287

http://usfsm.edu/research  | Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Records of the University of South Florida are subject to disclosure under the Florida Public Records law unless exempt by law.

From: Research Administration List [mailto:xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG] On Behalf Of Pamela Tuffley
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 9:23 AM
To: xxxxxx@LISTS.HEALTHRESEARCH.ORG
Subject: [RESADM-L] Seeking Advice on R15

 

Hi all, and hope you had a great long weekend,

 

We are working with a PI who is seeking advice on where to discuss our institution's commitment to undergraduate research. Two of his colleagues addressed this in two different areas of their own applications - Facilities under Institutional Support and in the Research Strategy section. Fortunately, both applications were successful. But the PI would like to know which would be more effective or appropriate. Any thoughts?

 

Thank you!

 

Best,

Pamela Tuffley


--

Pamela Tuffley

Manager of Sponsored Research 

Development

Barnard College • Columbia University | 3009 Broadway | New York, NY 10027

Phone: 212.870.2526 | Fax: 646.745.8300 | Email: xxxxxx@barnard.edu

 

 

 


To unsubscribe from the RESADM-L list, click the following link:
http://lists.healthresearch.org/scripts/wa-HLTHRES.exe?SUBED1=RESADM-L&A=1



To unsubscribe from the RESADM-L list, click the following link:
http://lists.healthresearch.org/scripts/wa-HLTHRES.exe?SUBED1=RESADM-L&A=1